Sesshu (1421-1507) was a priest who visited China and studied painting
there for several years, at length returning in 1469, disappointed
with the living Chinese artists, and resolved to strike out a style of
his own, based upon that of the old masters. He was the boldest and
most original of Japanese landscape artists, leaving powerful and
poetic records of the scenery of his own land as well as that of
China, and trusting more to the sure and sweeping stroke of the brush
than to colour. Shubun was an artist of little less power, but he
followed more closely his exemplars, the Chinese masters of the 12th
and 13th centuries; while Kano Masanobu (1424-1520), trained in the
love of Chinese art, departed little from the canons he had learned
from Josetsu or Oguri Sotan. It was left to his more famous son,
Motonobu, to establish the school which bears the family name. Kano
Motonobu (1477-1559) was one of the greatest Japanese painters, an
eclectic of genius, who excelled in every style and every branch of
his art. His variety was inexhaustible, and he remains to this day a
model whom the most distinguished artists are proud to imitate. The
names of the celebrated members of this long line are too many to
quote here, but the most accomplished of his descendants was Tanyu,
who died in 1674, at the age of seventy-three. The close of this long
period brought a new style of art, that of the Korin school. Ogata
Korin (1653-1716) is claimed by both the Tosa and Kano schools, but
his work bears more resemblance to that of an erratic offshoot of the
Kano line named Sotatsu than to the typical work of the academies. He
was an artist of eccentric originality, who achieved wonders in bold
decorative effects in spite of a studied contempt for detail. As a
lacquer painter he left a strong mark upon the work of his
contemporaries and successors. His brother and pupil, Kenzan, adopted
his style, and left a reputation as a decorator of pottery hardly less
brilliant than Korin's in that of lacquer; and a later follower,
Hoitsu (1762-1828), greatly excelled the master in delicacy and
refinement, although inferior to him in vigour and invention. Down to
the end of this era painting was entirely in the hands of a patrician
caste--courtiers, priests, feudal nobles and their military retainers,
all men of high education and gentle birth, living in a polished
circle. It was practised more as a phase of aesthetic culture than
with any utilitarian views. It was a labour of loving service,
untouched by the spirit of material gain, conferring upon the work of
the older masters a dignity and poetic feeling which we vainly seek in
much of the later work. Unhappily, but almost inevitably, over-culture
led to a gradual falling-off from the old virility. The strength of
Meicho, Sesshu, Motonobu and Tanyu gave place to a more or less
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account