[55] _Metaphys. Z._ 12, H. 6 ground this formula metaphysically.
[56] 94a 12, 75b 32.
[57] 90a 6. Cf. Ueberweg, _System der Logik_, § 101.
[58] 78a 30 sqq.
[59] _Topics_, 101b 18, 19.
[60] _Posterior Analytics_, ii. 13.
[61] _Posterior Analytics_, ii. 16.
[62] _Posterior Analytics_, i. 13 ad. fin., and i. 27. The form which
a mathematical science treats as relatively self-subsistent is
certainly not the constitutive idea.
[63] _Posterior Analytics_, i. 3.
[64] _Posterior Analytics_, ii. 19.
[65] _De Anima_, 428b 18, 19.
[66] _Prior Analytics_, i. 30, 46a 18.
[67] _Topics_, 100b 20, 21.
[68] _Topics_, 101a 25, 36-37, b1-4, &c.
[69] Zeller (_loc. cit._ p. 194), who puts this formula in order to
reject it.
[70] _Metaphys._ [Delta] 1, 1013a 14.
[71] _Posterior Analytics_, 72a 16 seq.
[72] _Posterior Analytics_, 77a 26, 76a 37 sqq.
[73] _Metaphys._ [Gamma].
[74] _Posterior Analytics_, ii. 19.
[75] _de Anima_, iii. 4-6.
[76] _Metaphys._ M. 1087a 10-12; Zeller loc. cit. 304 sqq.; McLeod
Innes, _The Universal and Particular in Aristotle's Theory of
Knowledge_ (1886).
[77] _Topics_, 105a 13.
[78] _Metaphys._ 995a 8.
[79] E.g., _Topics_, 108b 10, "to induce" the universal.
[80] _Posterior Analytics_, ii. 19, 100b 3, 4.
[81] _Topics_, i. 18, 108b 10.
[82] _Prior Analytics_, ii. 23.
[83] [Greek: Paradeigma], Prior Analytics, ii. 24.
[84] Sigwart, _Logik_, Eng. trans. vol. ii. p. 292 and elsewhere.
[85] Ueberweg, _System_, § 127, with a ref. to _de Partibus
Animalium_, 667a.
[86] See 67a 17 [Greek: ex hapantôn tôn atomôn].
[87] [Greek: Epiphora]. [Greek: Epi] = "in" as in [Greek: epagôgê],
inductio, and [Greek: -phora] = -ferentia, as in [Greek: diaphora],
dif_ferentia_.
[88] Diog. Laërt. x. 33 seq.; Sext. Emp. Adv. Math. vii. 211.
[89] Diog. Laërt. x. 87; cf. Lucretius, vi. 703 sq., v. 526 sqq. (ed.
Munro).
[90] Sextus Empiricus, _Pyrrhon. Hypotyp._ ii. 195, 196.
[91] Sextus, _op. cit._ ii. 204.
[92] _Op. cit._ iii. 17 sqq., and especially 28.
[93] The point is raised by Aristotle, 95A.
[94] See Jourdain, _Recherches critiques sur l'âge et l'origine des
traductions latines d'Aristote_ (1843).
[95] See E. Cassirer, _Das Erkenntnisproblem_, i. 134 seq., and the
justificatory excerpts, pp. 539 sqq.
[96] See Riehl in _Vierteljahrschr. f. wiss. Philos._ (1893).
[97] Bacon, _Novum Organum_, ii. 22, 23; cf. also Aristotle, _Topics_
i. 12. 13, ii. 10. 11 (Stewart, ad _Nic. Eth._ 1139b 27) and Sextus
Empiricus, _Pyrr. Hypot._ iii. 15.
[98] Bacon's _Works_, ed. Ellis and Spedding, iii. 164-165.
[99] A notable formula of Bacon's _Novum Organum_ ii. 4 § 3 turns
out, _Valerius Terminus_, cap. 11, to come from Aristotle, _Post.
An._ i. 4 _via_ Ramus. See Ellis in Bacon's _Works_, iii. 203 sqq.
[100] _De Civitate Dei_, xi. 26. "Certum est me esse, si fallor."
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account