The four bases thus laid down by ash-Shafi`i--Koran; prophetic usage
as expressed in traditions; analogy; agreement--have come to be
accepted by all existing schools. This applies to all spheres of life,
ethical, social, theological, legal, and it should never be forgotten
that the Koran is only one of the sources for Moslem faith and
conduct.
Few words are needed for the other, reactionary schools. One, now long
extinct, was founded by a certain Da`ud uz-Zahiri, "David the
Literalist," born three or four years before the death of ash-Shafi`i,
and so called because he insisted upon an absolutely literal
interpretation of his texts--Koran or tradition--without account of
context or metaphor. In consequence he had to reject analogy, and
limited agreement to that of the companions of Mahomet; the Church of
Islam was to have no constructive authority. In one point he showed
great sanity of judgment, namely in his rejection of the principle
_jurare in verba magistri_, otherwise regnant in Islam. His school had
long and interesting consequences, mostly theological, but is now
extinct, and never took rank with the others. The Moslem world found
his positions too impossible, and now no one swears to his words. The
other, the Hanbalite school, was founded by the scholars of Ahmad ibn
Hanbal after his death in 885. He himself would never have revolted
against his master, ash-Shafi`i, but it was soon felt that his system,
so far as he had any, was in essential opposition. He had been no
lawyer, but a theologian and a collector and student of traditions.
All his life had been a protest against speculation in divine things.
Where the Koran and traditions were silent, he, too, had been silent.
For this agnostic principle he had witnessed and suffered, and his
standing with the people was that of a saint. Naturally, then, the
last still existent school of traditionalist protest was launched in
his name. It minimizes agreement and analogy, is literal in its
interpretations, and is now by far the smallest of the four surviving
schools. Its external history is that of a testifying and violent
minority.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account