Becquerel (_Comptes rendus_, 125, p. 683) gives for r the expression
e H dµ
½ --- ---- ---------,
m v0 d[lambda]
where [lambda] is the wave length. This is equivalent to (2) if µ is
given by (1). He has shown that this expression is in good agreement
with experiment. The sign of r depends on the sign of e, hence the
rotation due to negative ions would be opposite to that for positive.
For the great majority of substances the direction of rotation is that
corresponding to the negation ion. We see from the equations that the
rotation is very large for such a value of p as makes P = 0: this
value corresponds to a free period of the ions, so that the rotation
ought to be very large in the neighbourhood of an absorption band.
This has been verified for sodium vapour by Macaluso and Corbino.[43]
If plane-polarized light falls normally on a plane face of the medium
containing the ions, then if the electric force in the incident wave
is parallel to x and is equal to the real part of A[epsilon]^[l(pt -
qz)], if the reflected beam in which the electric force is parallel to
x is represented by B[epsilon]^[l(pt + qz)] and the reflected beam in
which the electric force is parallel to the axis of y by
C[epsilon]^[l(pt + qz)], then the conditions that the magnetic force
parallel to the surface is continuous, and that the electric forces
parallel to the surface in the air are continuous with Y0, X0 in the
medium, give
A B [iota]C
----------------- = ----------- = ----------
(q + q1) (q + q2) (q² - q1q2) q(q2 - q1)
or approximately, since q1 and q2 are nearly equal,
[iota]C q(q2 - q1) (µ² - 1)pH
------- = ---------- = ------------.
B q² - q1² 4[pi]µne V0²
Thus in transparent bodies for which µ is real, C and B differ in
phase by [pi]/2, and the reflected light is elliptically polarized,
the major axis of the ellipse being in the plane of polarization of
the incident light, so that in this case there is no rotation, but
only elliptic polarization; when there is strong absorption so that µ
contains an imaginary term, C/B will contain a real part so that the
reflected light will be elliptically polarized, but the major axis is
no longer in the plane of polarization of the incident light; we
should thus have a rotation of the plane of polarization superposed on
the elliptic polarization.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account