_Phonetics._[6]--In the standard dialect the vowels are the same as in
Sanskrit, but _r_ and _l_ only appear in words borrowed directly from
that language (_tatsamas_). Final short vowels (_a_, _i_ and _u_) have
all disappeared in prose pronunciation, except in a few local
dialects, and final _i_ and _u_ are not even written. On the other
hand, in the Nagari character, the non-pronunciation of a final _a_ is
not indicated. After an accented syllable a medial _a_ is pronounced
very lightly, even when the accent is not the main accent of the word.
Thus, if we indicate the main accent by ', and subsidiary accents
(equivalent to the Hebrew _methegh_) by `, then the word _kárawat_, a
saw, is pronounced _kár^awat_; and _kàlakálane_, to be agitated, is
pronounced _kàl^akál^an_e. In Konkani the vowel _a_ assumes the sound
of o in "hot," a sound which is also heard in the language of Bengal.
In dialectic speech _e_ is often interchangeable with short or long
_a_, so that the standard _sangit^al_e, it was said, may appear as
_sangit^ala_ or _sangit^ala_. The vowels _e_ and _o_ are apparently
always long in the standard dialect, thus following Sanskrit; but in
Konkani there is a short and a long form of each vowel. Very probably,
although the distinction is not observed in writing, and has not been
noticed by native scholars, these vowels are also pronounced short in
the standard dialect under the circumstances to be now described. When
a long _a_, _i_ or _u_ precedes an accented syllable it is usually
shortened. In the case of _a_ the shortening is not indicated by the
spelling, but the written long _a_ is pronounced short like the _a_ in
the Italian _ballo_. Thus, the dative of _pik_, a ripe crop, is
_pikas_, and that of _hat_, a hand, is _hatas_, pronounced _hatas_.
Almost the only compound consonants which survived in the Prakrit
stage were double letters, and in M. these are usually simplified, the
preceding vowel being lengthened in compensation. Thus, the Prakrit
_kanno_ becomes _kan_, an ear; Pr. _bhikkha_ becomes _bhik_, alms; and
Pr. _putto_ becomes _put_, a son. In the Pisaca (see INDO-ARYAN
LANGUAGES) and other languages of north-western India it is not usual
to lengthen the vowel in compensation, and the same tendency is
observable in Konkani, which, it may be remarked, appears to contain
many relics of the old Prakrit (Saurastri) spoken in the Gujarat
country before the invasion from the Midland. Thus, in Konkani, we
have _put_ as well as _put_, while the word corresponding to the Pr.
_ekko_, one, is _ek_ as well as the standard _ek_.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account