Enfranchisement of women : $b Reprinted from the Westminster and Foreign Quarterly Review, for July 1851Mill, Harriet Hardy Taylor
Philosophy
Enfranchisement of women : $b Reprinted from the Westminster and Foreign Quarterly Review, for July 1851
Mill, Harriet Hardy Taylor
Equality; Women -- Suffrage; Women's rights
These propositions it is now our purpose to maintain. But, before
entering on them, we would endeavor to dispel the preliminary
objections which, in the minds of persons to whom the subject is
new, are apt to prevent a real and conscientious examination of it.
The chief of these obstacles is that most formidable one--custom.
Women never have had equal rights with men. The claim in their
behalf, of the common rights of mankind, is looked upon as barred
by universal practice. This strongest of prejudices, the prejudice
against what is new and unknown, has, indeed, in an age of changes
like the present, lost much of its force; if it had not, there would
be little hope of prevailing against it. Over three fourths of the
habitable world, even at this day, the answer, "It has always been
so," closes all discussion. But it is the boast of modern Europeans,
and of their American kindred, that they know and do many things
which their forefathers neither knew nor did; and it is, perhaps, the
most unquestionable point of superiority in the present, above former
ages, that habit is not now the tyrant it formerly was over opinions
and modes of action, and that the worship of custom is a declining
idolatry. An uncustomary thought, on a subject which touches the
greater interests of life, still startles when first presented; but
if it can be kept before the mind until the impression of strangeness
wears off, it obtains a hearing, and as rational a consideration as the
intellect of the hearer is accustomed to bestow on any other subject.
In the present case, the prejudice of custom is doubtless on the
unjust side. Great thinkers, indeed, at different times, from Plato to
Condorcet, besides some of the most eminent names of the present age,
have made emphatic protests in favor of the equality of women. And
there have been voluntary societies, religious or secular, of which
the Society of Friends is the most known, by whom that principle was
recognized. But there has been no political community or nation in
which, by law, and usage, women have not been in a state of political
and civil inferiority. In the ancient world, the same fact was alleged,
with equal truth, in behalf of slavery. It might have been alleged in
favor of the mitigated form of slavery, serfdom, all through the middle
ages. It was urged against freedom of industry, freedom of conscience,
freedom of the press; none of these liberties were thought compatible
with a well-ordered state, until they had proved their possibility
by actually existing as facts. That an institution or a practice is
customary, is no presumption of its goodness, when any other sufficient
cause can be assigned for its existence. There is no difficulty in
understanding why the subjection of women has been a custom. No other
explanation is needed than physical force.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account