Engineers and their triumphs: the story of the locomotive, the steamship, bridge building, tunnel makingHolmes, F. M. (Frederic Morell)
History
Engineers and their triumphs: the story of the locomotive, the steamship, bridge building, tunnel making
Holmes, F. M. (Frederic Morell)
Engineering; Engineers
Stephenson’s first engine did not differ very materially from some of
those which had preceded it. He was, so to speak, feeling his way. The
machine had a round, wrought-iron boiler, eight feet long, with two
upright cylinders placed on the top of it. At the end of the pistons
from the cylinders were cross-rods connected with cogged wheels below
by other rods. These cogged wheels gave motion to the wheels running
on the rails by cogs not very far from the axles. Stephenson abandoned
the cogged rail, and adopted smooth wheels and smooth rails; but he did
not connect the driving-wheel direct with the piston, the intervening
cogged wheels being thought necessary to unite the power of the two
cylinders.
In adopting the principle of smooth wheels on smooth rails, it is said
that Stephenson proved by experiment that the arrangement would work
satisfactorily. Mr. Smiles writes that Robert Stephenson informed him,
“That his father caused a number of workmen to mount upon the wheels
of a waggon moderately loaded, and throw their entire weight upon the
spokes on one side, when he found that the waggon could thus be easily
propelled forward without the wheels slipping. This, together with
other experiments, satisfied him of the expediency of adopting smooth
wheels on his engine, and it was so finished accordingly.” Thus it may
be said that this obstacle—imaginary though it largely proved to be—was
cleared away from Stephenson’s first engine.
Ten months were occupied in building the machine, and at last came the
day of its trial. This was the 25th of July, 1814. Would it work?
Jolting and jerking along, it did work, hauling eight carriages at a
speed of about four or six miles an hour—as fast as a brisk man could
walk. Then came the question—Would it prove more economical than
horse-power?
Calculations therefore were made, and after a time it was found that
“Blucher” as the engine was called, though we believe its real name was
“My Lord,” was about as expensive as horse-power.
The locomotive needed something more, some magic touch to render it
less clumsy and more effective. What was it?
Then came the first great practicable improvement after the smooth
wheels on smooth rails. It was the steam-blast in the funnel, by which
the draught in the furnace was greatly increased. Indeed, the faster
the engine ran the more furiously the fire would burn, the more rapid
would be the production of steam, and the greater the power of the
engine.
At first Stephenson had allowed his waste steam from the cylinders
to blow off into the air. So great was the nuisance caused by this
arrangement that a law-suit was threatened if it were not abated.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account