Engineers and their triumphs: the story of the locomotive, the steamship, bridge building, tunnel makingHolmes, F. M. (Frederic Morell)
History
Engineers and their triumphs: the story of the locomotive, the steamship, bridge building, tunnel making
Holmes, F. M. (Frederic Morell)
Engineering; Engineers
At another part of the railway called Parr Moss an embankment about
a mile and a-half was formed by pouring into it stone and clay from
a “cutting” in the neighbourhood. In some places twenty-five feet of
earth was thus concealed beneath the Moss. The eye of the engineer had
as it were pierced through the bog and seen that his solid bank was
steadily being built up there.
Before, however, the road across Chat Moss was fairly opened, the trial
of locomotives for the prize of £500 had taken place. The fateful
day was the 1st day of October, 1829, and the competition was held
at Rainhill. A grand stand was erected, and the side of the railway
was crowded. Thousands of spectators were present. The future of the
locomotive was to be decided on this momentous occasion.
Now, hitherto the difficulty in the locomotive had been to supply a
steady and sufficient supply of steam to work the engine quickly and
attain high speed and power. Partly, this had been accomplished by
Stephenson’s device of the steam-blast in the funnel. But something
more was needed.
That requirement was found in the tubular boiler. If the long
locomotive boiler were pierced with tubes from end to end, it is clear
that the amount of heating surface offered to the action of the fire
would be greatly increased. It was this idea which was utilised in the
“Rocket,” the engine with which Stephenson competed at Rainhill, and
utilised more perfectly than ever before.
Trevithick himself seems to have invented something of the kind, and
M. Seguin, the engineer of the St. Etienne and Lyons Railway utilised
a similar method. But Henry Booth, the secretary of the railway which
Stephenson was then building, invented a tubular boiler without, it is
said, knowing anything of Seguin’s plan, and Stephenson who had already
experimented in the same direction, adopted Booth’s method.
At first it was a failure. The boiler, fitted with tubes through
which the hot air could pass, leaked disastrously, and Stephenson’s
son, Robert, wrote to his father in despair. But again George said
“persevere,” and he suggested a plan for conquering the difficulty.
Again, it was a simple, but as the event proved, an effective plan.
The copper tubes were merely to be fitted tightly to holes bored in the
boiler and soldered in. The heat caused the copper to expand and the
result was a very strong and water-tight boiler. There were twenty-five
of these tubes, each three inches in diameter, and placed in the lower
portion of the boiler, leading from the furnace to the funnel. Water
also surrounded the furnace. Further, the nozzles of the steam-blast
pipes were contracted so as to increase the power of the blast, and
consequently raise the strength of the draught to the fire.
[Illustration: “THE ROCKET.”]
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account