England and Canada: A Summer Tour Between Old and New Westminster, with Historical NotesFleming, Sandford
History
England and Canada: A Summer Tour Between Old and New Westminster, with Historical Notes
Fleming, Sandford
Canada -- Description and travel
Since the days when the Colonial House of Assembly possessed the
power of directing its own local affairs there has been an end of the
heart-burnings and disputes which were never absent on any assertion
of Downing street control. The concession of self-government in a
few years not only quieted the public mind concerning much which had
agitated it, but it admitted the settlement of the most difficult
questions, such as the Seigniorial Tenure in French Canada and the
advance of money on municipal security. It enabled each successive
administration to devote its energies to the establishment of the great
public works necessary to open out important lines of communication.
The true principle of colonial government has thus been realized. Great
Britain has adopted as a fixed policy and has faithfully adhered to the
principle of giving to her colonies of European races, equally with the
United Kingdom, the fullest liberty of self-government, entailing upon
them the wise observance of their political duties. As a consequence
a totally new character has been given to Provincial aspirations.
The principle, even with enlarged powers, has been extended to the
Confederated Provinces of the Dominion. Many prominent men have
advocated an extension of the system. They claim that the Dominion
should be represented in the Imperial Parliament. The difficulty must
always exist that the Canadian, as a representative of his own country,
cannot with propriety interfere with questions affecting the domestic
and political condition of the people of the British Isles. Their
internal affairs can only be constitutionally controlled by their own
representatives in parliament at Westminster. The Canadian’s interests
are assured by his own institutions. It is the Parliament at Ottawa
which controls the laws of the Dominion. Those who dwell in the United
Kingdom might equally claim to interfere in the legislation of this
country as the Canadian to vote on laws in the working of which he
has no direct interest. It would be at variance with all right for
a representative from this side of the Atlantic to cast a vote on
questions of taxation and expenditure to which the Dominion in no way
contributed.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account