I was indeed very much surprised at the attempt of Mr. Bourassa to use the authority of Sir Erskine May in support of his erroneous pretension that the autonomous colonies of Great Britain were Sovereign States. To all the students of the Constitutional History of England, Sir Erskine May is a very well known and appreciated writer. I have read his works several times over for many years. I was certain that he had never written anything to justify the Nationalist leader in quoting him as he did. Here follows the paragraph of May's Constitutional History quoted by Mr. Bourassa in support of his own views:-- Parliament has recently pronounced it to be just that the Colonies which enjoy self-government, should undertake the responsibility and cost of their own military defence. To carry this policy into effect must be the work of time. But whenever it may be effected, the last material bond of connection with the Colonies will have been severed, and colonial states, acknowledging the honorary sovereignty of England, and fully armed for self-defence, as well against herself as others, will have grown out of the dependencies of the British Empire. I must say that I am absolutely unable to detect one single word in the above quotation to authorize Mr. Bourassa to affirm that Sir Erskine May was of opinion that "_the autonomous colonies were Sovereign States_." The true meaning of the above extract is surely very plain. What does it say? It declares, what was a fact, that the British _Parliament has recently pronounced it to be just that the Colonies which enjoy self-government should undertake the responsibility and cost of their own military defence_. Would the British Parliament have deemed it necessary to express such an opinion, if the Colonies had, then, been Sovereign States, consequently obliged, in duty bound, to defend themselves _alone_ against any possible enemy. Surely not, for the obvious reason that Great Britain would have had no more responsibility for the defence of territories no longer covered by her flag and under her Sovereignty. The very fact that the British Parliament thought proper, _under the then circumstances_, to say that the Colonies enjoying self-government should undertake to defend themselves, is the convincing proof that they were not Sovereign States. The following sentence of May's quotation says:--_To carry this policy into effect must be the work of time_. It is clear that the _policy_ requiring the work of time to be carried into effect was not actually existent at the time Sir Erskine May was writing. The extract quoted by Mr. Bourassa concludes by declaring that when such a policy _has_ been finally adopted, the Colonies will have developed into Colonial States having _grown out of the dependencies of the British Empire_.