England, My EnglandLawrence, D. H. (David Herbert)
General
England, My England
Lawrence, D. H. (David Herbert)
England -- Social life and customs -- 20th century -- Fiction; Short stories, English
So when the war broke out his whole instinct was against it: against
war. He had not the faintest desire to overcome any foreigners or to
help in their death. He had no conception of Imperial England, and Rule
Britannia was just a joke to him. He was a pure-blooded Englishman,
perfect in his race, and when he was truly himself he could no more
have been aggressive on the score of his Englishness than a rose can be
aggressive on the score of its rosiness.
No, he had no desire to defy Germany and to exalt England. The
distinction between German and English was not for him the distinction
between good and bad. It was the distinction between blue water-flowers
and red or white bush-blossoms: just difference. The difference between
the wild boar and the wild bear. And a man was good or bad according to
his nature, not according to his nationality.
Egbert was well-bred, and this was part of his natural understanding.
It was merely unnatural to him to hate a nation _en bloc_. Certain
individuals he disliked, and others he liked, and the mass he knew
nothing about. Certain deeds he disliked, certain deeds seemed natural
to him, and about most deeds he had no particular feeling.
He had, however, the one deepest pure-bred instinct. He recoiled
inevitably from having his feelings dictated to him by the mass
feeling. His feelings were his own, his understanding was his own, and
he would never go back on either, willingly. Shall a man become
inferior to his own true knowledge and self, just because the mob
expects it of him?
What Egbert felt subtly and without question, his father-in-law felt
also in a rough, more combative way. Different as the two men were,
they were two real Englishmen, and their instincts were almost the
same.
And Godfrey Marshall had the world to reckon with. There was German
military aggression, and the English non-military idea of liberty and
the “conquests of peace”—meaning industrialism. Even if the choice
between militarism and industrialism were a choice of evils, the
elderly man asserted his choice of the latter, perforce. He whose soul
was quick with the instinct of power.
Egbert just refused to reckon with the world. He just refused even to
decide between German militarism and British industrialism. He chose
neither. As for atrocities, he despised the people who committed them
as inferior criminal types. There was nothing national about crime.
And yet, war! War! Just war! Not right or wrong, but just war itself.
Should he join? Should he give himself over to war? The question was in
his mind for some weeks. Not because he thought England was right and
Germany wrong. Probably Germany was wrong, but he refused to make a
choice. Not because he felt inspired. No. But just—war.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account