England under the Angevin Kings, Volume INorgate, Kate
History
England under the Angevin Kings, Volume I
Norgate, Kate
Anjou, House of; England -- Civilization -- 1066-1485; Great Britain -- History -- Angevin period, 1154-1216
of justice and government throughout the whole, and receive the value
of the other half annually from my treasury in England. Thus you may
enjoy pleasure and feasting to your heart’s content, while I will take
upon me the labours of government, and guarantee the fulfilment of
my pledge, if you will but keep quiet.” Foolish to the last, Robert
declined the offer; and the two armies made themselves ready for
battle.[38] In point of numbers they seem to have been not unequally
matched, but they differed greatly in character. Robert was stronger
in footsoldiers, Henry in knights; the flower of the Norman nobility
was on his side now, besides his Angevin, Cenomannian and Breton
allies;[39] while of those who followed Robert some, as the issue
proved, were only half-hearted. Of Henry’s genuine English troops there
is no account, but the men of his own day looked upon his whole host
as English in contradistinction to Robert’s Normans, and the tactics
adopted in the battle were thoroughly English. The king of England
fought on foot with his whole army, and it seems that the duke of
Normandy followed his example.[40]
[32] Eng. Chron. a. 1104. Will. Malm. _Gesta Reg._, l. v. c.
397 (Hardy, p. 623).
[33] Ord. Vit. (Duchesne, _Hist. Norm. Scriptt._), p. 814.
[34] Chron. S. Albin. a. 1105 (Marchegay, _Eglises d’Anjou_, p.
30).
[35] Ord. Vit. (Duchesne, _Hist. Norm. Scriptt._), p. 818.
Chron. S. Albin. a. 1105 (Marchegay, _Eglises d’Anjou_, p. 30).
[36] “Helias a Normannis rogatus discessit,” says Orderic (as
above). What can this mean?
[37] Eng. Chron. a. 1106.
[38] Ord. Vit. (Duchesne, _Hist. Norm. Scriptt._), p. 820.
[39] _Ib._ p. 820. Hen. Huntingdon, l. vii. c. 25 (Arnold, p.
235).
[40] Hen. Hunt., l. vii. c. 25 (Arnold, p. 235).
The first line of the Norman or ducal host under William of Mortain
charged the English front under Ralf of Bayeux, and by the fury of
their onset compelled them to fall back, though without breaking their
ranks. The issue was still doubtful, when the only mounted division
of Henry’s troops, the Bretons and Cenomannians under Count Elias,
came up to the rescue, took the duke’s army in flank, and cut down
two hundred men in a single charge. Those Cenomannian swords which
William the Conqueror was so proud to have overcome now carried the
day for his youngest son. Robert of Bellême, as soon as he saw how
matters were going, fled with all his followers, and the duke’s army at
once dissolved.[41] In Henry’s own words, “the Divine Mercy gave into
my hands, without much slaughter on our side, the duke of Normandy,
the count of Mortain, William Crispin, William Ferrers, Robert of
Estouteville, some four hundred knights, ten thousand foot--and the
duchy of Normandy.”[42]
[41] Ord. Vit. (Duchesne, _Hist. Norm. Scriptt._), p. 821. Eng.
Chron. a. 1106. Hen. Hunt., as above.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account