England under the Angevin Kings, Volume INorgate, Kate
History
England under the Angevin Kings, Volume I
Norgate, Kate
Anjou, House of; England -- Civilization -- 1066-1485; Great Britain -- History -- Angevin period, 1154-1216
[114] _Hist. Monast. de Abingdon_ (Stevenson), vol. ii. pp. 15,
284. See also Parker, _Early Hist. Oxf._, p. 219.
[115] See lists in Parker as above, pp. 284–286.
[116] He founded S. George’s in 1074; Ann. Osen. ad ann. On S.
Peter’s see Parker as above, pp. 250–254.
[117] _Hist. Abingdon_ (Stevenson), vol. ii. p. 15.
[118] See the evidence in Parker’s _Early Hist. of Oxford_, pp.
209, 223, 258–261.
[119] Will. Malm. _Gesta Pontif._, l. iv. c. 178 (Hamilton, pp.
315, 316). Dugdale, _Monast. Angl._, vol. ii. pp. 143, 144. The
Augustinians came there in 1111, according to the chronicle
of Tynemouth, quoted in _Monast._ (as above), p. 143; but the
local record in p. 144 gives 1121.
[120] Ann. Osen. a. 1129.
[121] _Ib._ a. 1133.
[122] Charter of Henry II., Stubbs, _Select Charters_, p. 167.
[123] Domesday, vol. i. p. 154.
[124] Will. Malm. _Gesta Pontif._, l. iv. c. 178 (Hamilton p.
315).
[125] “Ad Pascha fuit rex apud Oxineford in novâ aulâ.” Rob. of
Torigni, a. 1133.
[Illustration: Plan V.
LONDON in the XII century.
Wagner & Debes’ Geogˡ. Estabᵗ. Leipsic. London, Macmillan & Co.
]
Our great picture of medieval London belongs in all its completeness
to a somewhat later date; it was painted in the closing years of the
twelfth century. But, as in the case of so many other things which only
come out into full light under Henry II., although the colouring and
the details may belong more especially to his time, the main features
were already there in the time of his grandfather. The outline of
the city was a sort of irregular half-ellipse, fenced in upon the
northern or land side by a girdle of massive walls pierced with gates
and fortified with lofty towers; the wall on the south side, being
built close upon the river bank, was gradually washed away by the ebb
and flow of the tide constantly beating upon its foundations. On this
side the river itself was an all-sufficient protection. The eastern
extremity of the city, where the wall came down towards the water’s
edge, was guarded by a mighty fortress, founded by King William in the
earliest days of his conquest to hold his newly-won capital in check,
and always known by the emphatic name of “the Tower.” The western
end was protected by two lesser fortresses,[126]--Castle Baynard and
Montfichet, whose sokes filled up the space between the cathedral
precincts and the city wall. Another, which must have stood in the
same neighbourhood, seems to have been partly destroyed by the fire
which ravaged London a few months before the Conqueror’s death, and
in which the cathedral of S. Paul entirely perished.[127] Part of the
ditch of this fortress was surrendered by King Henry to make room for
a wall with which Bishop Richard was now enclosing his precincts;[128]
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account