England under the Angevin Kings, Volume II — John Shaqi
England under the Angevin Kings, Volume IINorgate, Kate
History
England under the Angevin Kings, Volume II
Norgate, Kate
Anjou, House of; England -- Civilization -- 1066-1485; Great Britain -- History -- Angevin period, 1154-1216
[86] Garnier (Hippeau), pp. 30–32. Will. Cant. (Robertson,
_Becket_, vol. i.), pp. 12, 13. E. Grim (_ib._ vol. ii.), pp.
374–376. Will. Fitz-Steph. (_ib._ vol. iii.), p. 45. Herb.
Bosh. (_ib._), pp. 265, 266. Anon. I. (_ib._ vol. iv.), pp.
24, 25. R. Diceto (Stubbs), vol. i. p. 313. There is another
version in _Thomas Saga_ (Magnusson), vol. i. p. 145.
[87] Herb. Bosh. (as above), pp. 264, 265. _Thomas Saga_ (as
above), p. 143.
[88] Will. Fitz-Steph. as above.
[89] Will. Fitz-Steph. (Robertson, _Becket_, vol. iii.), pp.
45, 46.
[90] Herb. Bosh. (_ibid._), p. 267.
[91] Will. Fitz-Steph. (_ibid._), p. 46.
[92] Herb. Bosh. (_ibid._), p. 266. Anon. II. (_ib._ vol. iv.),
p. 95. _Summa Causæ_ (_ibid._), p. 201; this last gives the
date.
The king’s first proposition, that the bishops should confirm the old
customs observed in his grandfather’s days,[93] opened a discussion
which lasted far into the night. Henry himself proceeded to explain
his meaning more fully; he required, first, that the bishops should
be more strict in the pursuit of criminal clerks;[94] secondly, that
all such clerks, when convicted and degraded, should be handed over to
the secular arm for temporal punishment like laymen, according to the
practice usual under Henry I.;[95] and finally, that the bishops should
renounce their claim to inflict any temporal punishment whatever, such
as exile or imprisonment in a monastery, which he declared to be an
infringement of his regal rights over the territory of his whole realm
and the persons of all his subjects.[96] The primate, after vainly
begging for an adjournment till the morrow, retired to consult with
his suffragans.[97] When he returned, it was to set forth his view of
the “two swords”--the two jurisdictions, spiritual and temporal--in
terms which put an end to all hope of agreement with the king. He
declared the ministers of the Heavenly King exempt from all subjection
to the judgement of an earthly sovereign; the utmost that he would
concede was that a clerk once degraded should thenceforth be treated
as a layman and punished as such if he offended again.[98] Henry,
apparently too much astonished to argue further, simply repeated his
first question--“Would the bishops obey the royal customs?” “Aye,
saving our order,” was the answer given by the primate in the name and
with the consent of all.[99] When appealed to singly they all made the
same answer.[100] Henry bade them withdraw the qualifying phrase, and
accept the customs unconditionally; they, through the mouth of their
primate, refused;[101] the king raged and swore, but all in vain. At
last he strode suddenly out of the hall without taking leave of the
assembly;[102] and when morning broke they found that he had quitted
London.[103] Before the day was over, Thomas received a summons to
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account