England under the Angevin Kings, Volume IINorgate, Kate
History
England under the Angevin Kings, Volume II
Norgate, Kate
Anjou, House of; England -- Civilization -- 1066-1485; Great Britain -- History -- Angevin period, 1154-1216
force; his old scruple about making war upon his overlord seems not to
have been yet quite extinguished, and moreover he shrank alike from
the bloodshed and the expense of war. During some weeks his forces
were still kept idle, save for an occasional plundering-raid across
the French border.[1216] Philip meanwhile was carrying all before him
in Berry, and having conquered nearly the whole district, made a dash
upon Auvergne.[1217] Richard seized the opportunity for an attempt to
regain Châteauroux, in which however he failed, and was only saved
from capture or death by the help of a friendly butcher.[1218] His
advance however had been enough to make Philip retire into his own
domains.[1219] Soon afterwards the approach of the vintage-season
compelled the French king to disband a part of his forces; the
remainder, under command of the bishop of Beauvais, went to ravage
the Norman frontier-lands. Henry demanded reparation, and threatened
to cast off his allegiance in default of it; Philip retorted that he
would not cease from the warfare which he had begun till all Berry and
the Vexin were in his hands.[1220] At last, in the middle of August,
the two kings met in person once more between Gisors and Trie; but the
meeting broke up in anger; and when they parted, Philip in his rage cut
down the great elm tree under which the conferences between the rulers
of France and Normandy had so long been held, vowing that no conference
should ever be held there again.[1221]
[1208] Rog. Howden as above. Cf. _Gesta Hen._ as above, p. 39.
[1209] R. Diceto as above. Gir. Cambr. _De Instr. Princ._,
dist. iii. c. 7 (Angl. Christ. Soc., p. 103).
[1210] _Gesta Hen._ as above, p. 36.
[1211] R. Diceto (Stubbs), vol. ii. p. 55. Gerv. Cant.
(Stubbs), vol. i. p. 432, seems to have confused this siege of
Châteauroux with an earlier one. Cf. Will. Newb., l. iii. c.
25 (Howlett, vol. i. p. 276), Rigord (Duchesne, _Hist. Franc.
Scriptt._, vol. v.), p. 27, and Will. Armor., _Gesta Phil.
Aug._ (_ibid._), p. 74.
[1212] _Gesta Hen._ (Stubbs), vol. ii. p. 40. Cf. Gerv. Cant.
as above, p. 433. R. Diceto (as above) dates the king’s
crossing “circa festum S. Jacobi,” but this is clearly wrong.
[1213] _Gesta Hen._ as above.
[1214] R. Diceto as above.
[1215] Rog. Howden (Stubbs, vol. ii. p. 343) adds some troops
“from his other lands.”
[1216] Gerv. Cant. as above, pp. 433, 434.
[1217] Rigord as above. Will. Armor. as above; _Philipp._, l.
iii. (_ibid._), p. 122. Both these writers however throw some
suspicion upon their account of Philip’s successes by saying
that Henry was flying before him all the while, and was finally
chased back by him into Normandy--which in reality it seems
plain that he had never quitted.
[1218] Gerv. Cant. as above, p. 434.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account