English Cathedrals Illustrated: Second and Revised EditionBond, Francis
History
English Cathedrals Illustrated: Second and Revised Edition
Bond, Francis
Cathedrals -- England; Cathedrals -- Wales
I. In the east walls of the north choir-aisle and the Lady chapel three
small rude arches have recently been found, and outside, in the gardens,
the foundations of the walls of three apses. Hence it has been concluded
that we have here the eastern termination of Frideswide’s eighth-century
church. It may be so, but the central arch seems very small for the
chancel-arch of an aisled church. It is indeed a foot wider than the
chancel-arch of the Saxon church at Bradford-on-Avon, but that tiny
church has no aisles. Moreover, if the side-arches led into aisles, they
would be likely to be of the same height, whereas the southern arch is
considerably the higher of the two.
[Illustration: NAVE.]
II. At some later period—perhaps in the eighth or ninth century—the
foundation was converted into one of secular canons, married priests
taking the place of the nuns (cf. Ely). The secular canons themselves
in turn gave way to monks, and these in 1111 to regular canons—_i.e._,
canons living in monastic fashion under the rule (_regula_) of St.
Augustine, as at Bristol, Ripon, and Carlisle.
The first business, probably, of the secular canons was to house
themselves—_i.e._, to build themselves the usual cloister, with
its appanages of chapter-house, refectory, dormitory, etc. Of the
chapter-house which they built, _c._ 1125, the doorway still remains.
In 1004 King Ethelred had rebuilt the Saxon church; and probably it was
found possible to put this church into such repair as would allow the
services to be held in it for the time being. At any rate, it was not
till 1158 that they commenced the present cathedral, which they finished
in 1180, leaving not a stone standing of Ethelred’s cathedral. Of the
theory that the present cathedral is in the main the one built in 1004, I
would prefer to say nothing, had it not been adopted in a recent history
of the cathedral; suffice to say that, like the sister theory that
Waltham Abbey was built in 1060, it is an absolute impossibility. The
hands of the archæological clock cannot be turned 160 years back in this
preposterous fashion.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account