English Cathedrals Illustrated: Second and Revised EditionBond, Francis
History
English Cathedrals Illustrated: Second and Revised Edition
Bond, Francis
Cathedrals -- England; Cathedrals -- Wales
Externally, however, the madness of this engineering feat does not
trouble one. The addition of the tower and spire gives to the whole
composition that pyramidal outline which always presents such a
satisfactory appearance of stability to the eye—and in architectural
design it is the eye that has to be reckoned with. In Wren’s masterpiece,
St. Paul’s, one has the same central pyramidal outline of all the masses,
but in a still higher degree.
[Illustration: NAVE AND WEST FRONT.]
In both cases, in St. Paul’s and in Salisbury, unity is secured.
Salisbury spire is tall enough, St. Paul’s dome is tall and broad enough,
to impose unity on all the diverging masses of the building. The low
towers of Worcester and Hereford have no such supreme dominance.
Next to the abiding presence of the spire, unity is secured by scoring
strong, horizontal lines round the building, welding its masses into one
composition. Most cathedrals are contented, like Wells, with one strong
horizontal line—a broad parapet. But at Salisbury there is not only a
horizontal parapet, but a horizontal corbel-table as well; and there are
no less than three horizontal strings—one running round the base of the
walls, a second running along beneath the windows, and a third running
round the buttresses; moreover, each of these horizontal lines is scored
far more heavily than anywhere else. Especially remarkable is it to find
the upper flow of the buttresses stopped by a heavy string. Usually, in
Gothic, if a horizontal meets a vertical line, the former gives way;
here, as in Greek architecture, the vertical gives way to the horizontal
line. This architect saw, what few others of his day saw, that you may
make too much of the “aspiring principle” of Gothic; that if you suppress
the horizontal lines, you weaken the unity of the building, by failing to
tie all its parts together.
As we have seen, the appearance of stability was enhanced by the
pyramidal outline which the whole building ultimately assumed. But the
eye instinctively looks downwards also to see that the pyramidal outline
is continued there, it instinctively demands an emphatic spreading base.
It likes to see a rock-like foundation. At Salisbury all below is but
greensward. All the more carefully, therefore, has the builder spread
out and broadened and emphasised his base-courses, till art gives the
appearance of stability which nature has denied.
[Illustration: WEST FRONT]
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account