English Coast Defences: From Roman Times to the Early Years of the Nineteenth Century — John Shaqi
English Coast Defences: From Roman Times to the Early Years of the Nineteenth CenturyClinch, George
History
English Coast Defences: From Roman Times to the Early Years of the Nineteenth Century
Clinch, George
Great Britain -- Defenses
It may be noted that the favourite methods of the Danes when invading
England was to enter the rivers so as to reach by that means populous
towns and districts where they could seize valuable possessions. The
monastic houses were their favourite prey, and few in England escaped
injury or pillage at their hands.
The following extract from the "Anglo-Saxon Chronicle" gives a vivid
picture of the doings of the Danes at the end of the tenth century:
"A.D. 999. In this year the army again came about into the Thames,
and then went up along the Medway, and to Rochester. And then
the Kentish force came against them, and they stoutly engaged
together, but alas! that they too quickly gave way and fled;
because they had not the support which they should have had. And
the Danish had possession of the place of carnage; and then took
horses and rode whithersoever they themselves would, and ruined
and plundered almost all the West Kentish. Then the king with his
'witan' resolved that they should be opposed with a naval force,
and also with a land force. But when the ships were ready, then
they delayed from day to day, and harassed the poor people who
lay in the ships; and ever as it should be forwarder, so was it
later, from one time to another: and ever they let their foes'
army increase, and ever they receded from the sea, and ever they
went forth after them. And then in the end neither the naval force
nor the land force was productive of anything but the people's
distress, and a waste of money, and the emboldening of their
foes."
THE NORMAN INVASION OF ENGLAND
It is a remarkable fact that the greatest event in the whole history
of foreign attack upon England, namely, the invasion under the
leadership of William, Duke of Normandy, in 1066, excited less
interest, and provoked less effective opposition than many other
incidents of infinitely minor importance.
The invasion was not unexpected by any means. When tidings of the
projected invasion reached England, the largest fleet and army ever
seen in this country were being mobilized at Sandwich. Yet, when the
Norman invaders actually arrived the English made practically no
opposition at all. It appears that the crews of the navy were tired of
being under arms so long, and went home; whilst the king was bound to
go northward to put down the troubles in Yorkshire. Nothing was
ready.
The Norman fleet consisted, according to various accounts, of from 696
to 1,000 vessels. It can hardly be described as a navy, because the
ships were too small to carry much more than the men and their arms:
there was no room for provisions, and when on the 28 September 1066,
the invaders landed in Pevensey Bay they encountered no opposition. In
the Battle of Hastings the English forces were protected within
palisaded entrenchments, but the result of the conflict was a decisive
defeat.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account