English Interference with Irish IndustriesMacNeill, J. G. Swift (John Gordon Swift)
History
English Interference with Irish Industries
MacNeill, J. G. Swift (John Gordon Swift)
Ireland -- Economic conditions; Law -- Ireland
CHAPTER II.
ENGLISH LEGISLATION IN RESTRAINT OF IRISH TRADE 16
CHAPTER III.
ENGLISH OPPOSITION TO EFFORTS OF THE IRISH PARLIAMENT
IN FAVOUR OF IRISH TRADE 42
CHAPTER IV.
THE IMMEDIATE EFFECTS OF ENGLISH LEGISLATION ON IRISH
TRADE 56
CHAPTER V.
THE IRISH VOLUNTEER MOVEMENT AND FREE TRADE 74
CHAPTER VI.
THE COMMERCIAL ARRANGEMENTS BETWEEN ENGLAND AND
IRELAND, 1782-1800 91
CHAPTER VII.
THE COMMERCIAL ARRANGEMENTS BETWEEN ENGLAND AND
IRELAND EFFECTED BY THE ACT OF LEGISLATIVE UNION 104
ENGLISH INTERFERENCE
WITH
IRISH INDUSTRIES.
CHAPTER I.
THE POLITICAL RELATIONS OF IRELAND TO GREAT BRITAIN.
The interference of the English Government with Irish trade before
1782 was twofold, direct and indirect. The direct interference arose
from statutes passed in the English Parliament in restraint of Irish
commerce. The indirect interference arose from the influence of the
English Government over the legislation of the Irish Parliament, under
the provisions of the statute known as Poynings' Act.
"From the admitted dependence," says Mr. Butt, "of the Crown of Ireland
upon that of England, arose the claim of the English Parliament to
legislate for Ireland. Over all the colonies and dependencies of the
British Crown, the British Parliament had exercised the right of
legislation. Over Ireland they asserted the same right. I need not tell
you how fiercely it was contested, and that it was finally abandoned
in 1782. But, up to 1782, the right was asserted, and occasionally
exercised."[9]
These English statutes were chiefly aimed against the Irish
manufactures, and were, of course, clear violations of Ireland's
Parliamentary independence. The 6th Geo. I. passed by the English
Parliament[10] claimed the power of British legislation over Ireland, a
power which had been exercised long previously. "If that power," said
Mr. O'Connell, "so claimed, had really existed, where was the necessity
for passing that statute? and while this Act proclaims the slavery of
Ireland, it admits the pre-existence of freedom."[11]
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account