English Interference with Irish IndustriesMacNeill, J. G. Swift (John Gordon Swift)
History
English Interference with Irish Industries
MacNeill, J. G. Swift (John Gordon Swift)
Ireland -- Economic conditions; Law -- Ireland
Again, this system embittered the relations between landlord and
tenant in Ireland by raising unduly the creation of farms, the
cultivation of the soil being the only industrial resource left to
the people. "Rents," says Mr. Lecky, "were regulated by competition;
but it was competition between a half starving population, who had no
other resource except the soil, and were prepared to promise anything
rather than be deprived of it.[117] The mass of the people," the same
writer continues, "became cottiers, because it was impossible to gain
a livelihood as agricultural labourers or in mechanical pursuits. This
impossibility was due to the extreme paucity of circulating capital,
and may be chiefly traced to the destruction of Irish manufactures and
to the absence of a considerable class of resident landlords, who would
naturally give employment to the poor."[118]
Such were some of the more immediate effects upon Ireland of the
commercial arrangements of Great Britain. That system was thus
described in the Irish House of Commons in October, 1779, by Hussey
Burgh, who then held the office of Prime Serjeant, and afterwards
became Lord Chief Baron of the Court of Exchequer. "The usurped
authority of a foreign Parliament has kept up the most wicked laws that
a jealous, monopolising, ungrateful spirit could desire, to restrain
the bounty of Providence and enslave a nation whose inhabitants are
recorded to be a brave, loyal, generous people; by the English code
of laws, to answer the most sordid views, they have been treated with
a savage cruelty; the words penalty, punishment, and Ireland are
synonymous; they are marked in blood on the margin of their statutes,
and though time may have softened the calamities of the nation, the
baneful and destructive influence of those laws have borne her down to
a state of Egyptian bondage. The English have sowed their laws like
serpents' teeth; they have sprung up as armed men."[119]
Few will be disposed to disagree with Mr. Froude in his estimate of
the effects of this policy. "By a curious combination this system
worked the extremity of mischief, commercially, socially, and
politically."[120]
FOOTNOTES:
[85] "Eighteenth Century," vol. ii., 257, 258.
[86] "Eighteenth Century," vol. ii., 259.
[87] "English in Ireland," vol. i., 435.
[88] "English in Ireland," vol. i., 436.
[89] "Eighteenth Century," vol. ii., 255.
[90] "Eighteenth Century," vol. ii., 213.
[91] Swift's Works (Scott's Ed.), vol. vii., 195.
[92] "An Essay upon the Trade of Ireland"--"Tracts and Treatises"
(Ireland), 2, p. 335-6.
[93] "English in Ireland," vol. ii., 137.
[94] Newenham on "Population," p. 60. This remark is quoted by Mr.
Lecky.
[95] "Irish Debates," vol. iii., 130.
[96] "Commercial Restraints," pp. 24-27.
[97] Swift's Works (Scott's Edition), vol. vi., p. 277.
[98] Swift's Works (Scott's Edition), vol. vi., 281, 282.
[99] "England in the Eighteenth Century," vol. ii., 216.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account