Great Britain. Royal Commission on Poor Laws and Relief of Distress; Poor -- Great Britain; Poor laws -- Great Britain
definition excluding the independent female wage-earner from the term
"able-bodied," the Commissioners frequently use this term as applicable
to men only; and nowhere do they mention, in recommendation or by way
of illustration, under the category of able-bodied, the independent
woman worker.
[12] p. 228 of the Report of 1834.
When we pass to recommendations explicitly restricted to the
able-bodied, we are left in the same uncertainty as to what the term
includes. No definition of able-bodied occurs in the Report. From the
course of the argument throughout and all the illustrations from the
evidence, we infer that the Commissioners had exclusively in view
the adult man capable of obtaining employment in the labour market
at any wage whatsoever, together with his wife and children under
sixteen dependent on him. It is important to notice this ambiguity in
the Report of 1834, because it explains a similar ambiguity in the
subsequent policy of Parliament and the Central Authority.
Assuming that we understand what classes of persons were intended
by the Commissioners to be included under the term able-bodied, the
proposals of the Report of 1834 are clear and peremptory:
I. That outdoor relief to the able-bodied and their families should be
discontinued; except--
(_a_) As to medical relief; and
(_b_) Apprenticeship of children.
No other exceptions should be made. "Where cases of real hardship occur,
the remedy must be applied by individual charity, a virtue for which no
system of compulsory relief can or ought to be a substitute."[13] "It
appears to us that this prohibition" (of outdoor relief to the
able-bodied) "should come into universal operation at the end of two
years,"[14] Meanwhile, it was suggested--
(_a_) That there should be a gradual substitution of relief in kind
for money doles;[15]
(_b_) "That all who receive relief from the parish should work for
the parish exclusively, as hard and for less wages than independent
labourers work for individual employers."[16]
(_c_) That the able-bodied, even "of the best character," should
not be offered "more than a simple subsistence. The person of bad
character, if he be allowed anything, could not be allowed
less."[17]
[13] p. 263 of Report of 1834.
[14] p. 297 of Report of 1834.
[15] p. 298 of Report of 1834.
[16] p. 262 of Report of 1834, made by way of comment as to the
temporary policy.
[17] p. 264 of Report of 1834.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account