Error's chains : $b How forged and broken : A comparative history of the national, social and religious errors that mankind has fallen into and practised from the creation down to the present time.Dobbins, Frank S. (Frank Stockton)
Religion
Error's chains : $b How forged and broken : A comparative history of the national, social and religious errors that mankind has fallen into and practised from the creation down to the present time.
Dobbins, Frank S. (Frank Stockton)
Idols and images -- Worship; Mythology; Religions
One of the most extraordinary monuments of ancient England, is that
called Stonehenge. This is an Anglo-Saxon term, meaning the hanging
stones. This monument is situated on a small hill in the midst of a
barren plain. All around it funeral mounds are grouped. These mounds
are called “barrows,” and within three miles of Stonehenge there
are over three hundred and fifty of these that have been recently
discovered. The stones that constituted this Druid temple are many
of them lying prostrate on the ground, a few only remaining upright
with the gigantic stone slabs across their tops. Yet enough remains to
indicate the general design of the structure as it originally stood.
It consisted of an outer circle, about three hundred feet in diameter,
of thirty upright stones sustaining as many others laid horizontally
on their tops. Within this was another circle of upright ones, smaller
than those in the outer circle, and without any stones on their tops.
These stones are so large that it cannot be imagined how they were
raised to their lofty position. It is very evident that Stonehenge
was a place of worship, and from the number of grave-mounds, each
containing the remains of a number of bodies, it is evident that it was
a place of great sanctity. It has been supposed that serpent-worship
found a place here.
[Illustration: ANCIENT DRUIDIC WORSHIP AT STONEHENGE,
ENGLAND.]
HUMAN SACRIFICES.
Cæsar gives a very careful account of the Druids. In the century just
preceding the coming of Christ, Cæsar conquered the Britons. His
account of their condition is the more reliable because this conquest
put him in possession of the means of knowing the people who were in
the future to form a part of his empire. His testimony can best be
given in a translation of his own words. He says:
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account