The double helplessness of delusion and death should keep the door of
Rossetti's house, for example, and refuse him to the reader. His mortal
illness had nothing to do with his poetry. Some rather affected
objection is taken every now and then to the publication of some facts
(others being already well known) in the life of Shelley. Nevertheless,
these are all, properly speaking, biography. What is not biography is
the detail of the accident of the manner of his death, the detail of his
cremation. Or if it was to be told--told briefly--it was certainly not
for marble. Shelley's death had no significance, except inasmuch as he
died young. It was a detachable and disconnected incident. Ah, that was
a frost of fancy and of the heart that used it so, dealing with an
insignificant fact, and conferring a futile immortality. Those are ill-
named biographers who seem to think that a betrayal of the ways of death
is a part of their ordinary duty, and that if material enough for a last
chapter does not lie to their hand they are to search it out. They, of
all survivors, are called upon, in honour and reason, to look upon a
death with more composure. To those who loved the dead closely, this is,
for a time, impossible. To them death becomes, for a year,
disproportionate. Their dreams are fixed upon it night by night. They
have, in those dreams, to find the dead in some labyrinth; they have to
mourn his dying and to welcome his recovery in such a mingling of
distress and of always incredulous happiness as is not known even to
dreams save in that first year of separation. But they are not
biographers.
If death is the privacy of the woods, it is the more conspicuously secret
because it is their only privacy. You may watch or may surprise
everything else. The nest is retired, not hidden. The chase goes on
everywhere. It is wonderful how the perpetual chase seems to cause no
perpetual fear. The songs are all audible. Life is undefended,
careless, nimble and noisy.
It is a happy thing that minor artists have ceased, or almost ceased, to
paint dead birds. Time was when they did it continually in that British
School of water-colour art, stippled, of which surrounding nations, it
was agreed, were envious. They must have killed their bird to paint him,
for he is not to be caught dead. A bird is more easily caught alive than
dead.
A poet, on the contrary, is easily--too easily--caught dead. Minor
artists now seldom stipple the bird on its back, but a good sculptor and
a University together modelled their Shelley on his back, unessentially
drowned; and everybody may read about the sick mind of Dante Rossetti.
THE HONOURS OF MORTALITY
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account