Besides, why should we be cowed by the name of Action? ’Tis a trick of
the senses,—no more. We know that the ancestor of every action is a
thought. The poor mind does not seem to itself to be any thing unless
it have an outside badge,—some Gentoo diet, or Quaker coat, or
Calvinistic prayer-meeting, or philanthropic society, or a great
donation, or a high office, or, any how, some wild contrasting action
to testify that it is somewhat. The rich mind lies in the sun and
sleeps, and is Nature. To think is to act.
Let us, if we must have great actions, make our own so. All action is
of an infinite elasticity, and the least admits of being inflated with
the celestial air until it eclipses the sun and moon. Let us seek one
peace by fidelity. Let me heed my duties. Why need I go gadding into
the scenes and philosophy of Greek and Italian history before I have
justified myself to my benefactors? How dare I read Washington’s
campaigns when I have not answered the letters of my own
correspondents? Is not that a just objection to much of our reading? It
is a pusillanimous desertion of our work to gaze after our neighbors.
It is peeping. Byron says of Jack Bunting,—
“He knew not what to say, and so he swore.”
I may say it of our preposterous use of books,—He knew not what to do,
and so _he read_. I can think of nothing to fill my time with, and I
find the Life of Brant. It is a very extravagant compliment to pay to
Brant, or to General Schuyler, or to General Washington. My time should
be as good as their time,—my facts, my net of relations, as good as
theirs, or either of theirs. Rather let me do my work so well that
other idlers if they choose may compare my texture with the texture of
these and find it identical with the best.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account