American loyalists; Andros, Edmund, Sir, 1637-1714; Society of Friends -- New England; Witchcraft -- New England
may respect the grim determination of the severe magistrates who felt
it their duty, at whatever cost, to keep that which was committed
to their trust free from the poison of heresy and fanaticism, while
we sorrow at the blindness which hid from their eyes the folly and
the cruelty of their proceedings. We may sympathize with the tortured
Quakers, whom we now know to be harmless enthusiasts, yet without
approving or extenuating their mad actions, their abusive language, or
their grotesque indecencies; and we may hope that, though at enmity in
this life, yet, as Browning wrote of Strafford and Pym,
“in that world
Where great hearts led astray are turned again,”
both now are able to respect each other’s loyalty of purpose and
fidelity to their respective conceptions of truth.
NOTES.
[1] _Vide infra_, Note 6.
[2] George Fox, _Journal_. It is well to notice that of the ministers
mentioned by Fox by name or parish, Nath. Stevens, the rector of Fenny
Drayton, was a Presbyterian of some eminence, and was ejected for
non-conformity in 1662. So also was Matthew Cradock, the “priest of
Coventry,” who was a distinguished non-conformist divine. The priest
at Mansetter, who advised tobacco and psalm-singing, kept his living
during the whole period of the Commonwealth, and so may be presumed
not to have been a “Churchman” in the commonly received sense of the
term. “One Macham,” of whom Fox speaks, and who seems to have treated
him with more sympathetic kindness than any of the others, was a loyal
Churchman and was sequestered in 1645, as a penalty for his adherence
to the bishop and the king to whom he had sworn allegiance. It is
rather surprising to find historians in general, even those who should
be better informed, assuming that, because these men were filling the
parishes of the Church of England, they were, therefore, Church of
England clergymen.
[3] Bishop, George, _New England Judged_, London, 1661, pp. 14–25.
[4] Geo. E. Ellis, _Memorial History of Boston_, vol. i. p. 181.
[5] Hubbard’s _History of New England_, p. 553.
[6] _Massachusetts Records_, iv. (1), 276.
[7] Bishop, 5–13.
[8] Hazard, _Historical Collections_, ii. 349. _Rhode Island Records_,
i. 374.
[9] _Mass. Records_, iv. (1), 277.
[10] Bishop, 38, 39.
[11] Bishop, 40, 42.
[12] _Mass. Records_, iv. (1), 308. Bishop, 50.
[13] _Mass. Records_, iv. (1), 325.
[14] Bishop, 72, 73.
[15] _Mass. Records_, iv. (1), 345, 346.
[16] _Mass. Archives_, vol. x. p. 246.
[17] _Mass. Records_, iv. (1), 348. (In payment for this work Norton
received five hundred acres of land, a good price for a sermon.
_Ibid._, p. 397.)
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account