English literature -- 19th century -- History and criticism; Literature -- History and criticism
Philology might be made fascinating; the history of a word, and of the
processes by which its different forms, in different senses, were
developed, might be made as interesting as any other story of events. But
grammar is not taught thus: boys are introduced to a jargon about matters
meaningless, and they are naturally as much enchanted as if they were
listening to a _chimaera bombinans in vacuo_. The grammar, to them, is a
mere buzz in a chaos of nonsense. They have to learn the buzz by rote;
and a pleasant process that is--a seductive initiation into the
mysteries. When they struggle so far as to be allowed to try to read a
piece of Greek prose, they are only like the Marchioness in her
experience of beer: she once had a sip of it. Ten lines of Xenophon,
narrating how he marched so many parasangs and took breakfast, do not
amount to more than a very unrefreshing sip of Greek. Nobody even tells
the boys who Xenophon was, what he did there, and what it was all about.
Nobody gives a brief and interesting sketch of the great march, of its
history and objects. The boys straggle along with Xenophon, knowing not
whence or whither:
"They stray through a desolate region,
And often are faint on the march."
One by one they fall out of the ranks; they mutiny against Xenophon; they
murmur against that commander; they desert his flag. They determine that
anything is better than Greek, that nothing can be worse than Greek, and
they move the tender hearts of their parents. They are put to learn
German; which they do not learn, unluckily, but which they find it
comparatively easy to shirk. In brief, they leave school without having
learned anything whatever.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account