Essays In Pastoral MedicineWalsh, James J. (James Joseph)
Religion
Essays In Pastoral Medicine
Walsh, James J. (James Joseph)
First aid in illness and injury; Medicine
The effect of an action, the result or product of an effective cause
or agency, may in itself be an end or an object or a circumstance, and
it has influence in the determination of morality. Sometimes an act
has two effects, one good and the other bad; and that such an action
be lawful it is necessary (1) that the action itself be good or
indifferent; (2) that the good effect be intended and the evil effect
be not intended (chosen) but only reluctantly permitted; (3) that the
evil effect be not a means to secure the good effect; (4) that there
be present a motive sufficiently grave to excuse or counterbalance the
bad effect. {15} St. Thomas (_Sum. Theol_. 2. 2. q. 64, a. 7) Speaking
of killing a man in self-defence, says: "Nihil prohibet unius actus
esse duos effectus, quorum alter solum sit in intentione, alius vero
sit praeter intentionem. Morales autem actus recipiunt speciem
secundum id quod intenditur, non autem ab eo quod est praeter
intentionem, cum sit per accidens."
That an act, therefore, be morally good, or justifiable, (a) the whole
train of the tendency of the will must be good; that is, (1) the
object, (2) the end, (3) and the circumstances must be good; or (b)
the intention should be good, and the remaining elements in the train
of will-tendency are to be indifferent. That an act be morally bad it
is enough that the object, the end, or the circumstances be
inexcusably bad.
There may be honest doubt as to the existence of evil in the
circumstances or the end, and here enters the matter of probability;
but apart from this, some general rules of morality that govern all
cases may be formulated:
1. An intention or end which is gravely evil always makes the entire
action evil and unjustifiable.
2. An intention or end which is slightly evil, if it is the entire
end of an action, makes the whole action evil but not gravely
evil--makes it, say, a venial sin and not a mortal sin.
3. If an intention or end which is venially evil accompanies
secondarily a good intention or end, and is rather a motive than the
real effective agent in attracting the will, this venial evil does
not vitiate the whole goodness or righteousness of the main action.
Compare the remarks made above in discussing an action that has a
double effect, partly good and partly bad.
4. Circumstances that are gravely evil practically vitiate the
entire action, but circumstances which are venially evil do not
always vitiate the entire action.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account