Freud, S., ’13. “The Interpretation of Dreams.” London, 1913. ’14. “Psychopathology of Everyday Life.” London, 1914. Haldane, J. S., ’21. “Mechanism, Life, and Personality.” London, 1921. Harrison, Jane, ’09. “The Influence of Darwin on the Study of Religions.” In Seward, ’09, q. v. Huxley, T. H. “Evolution and Ethics. Collected Essays.” Vol. 9. London, 1906. James, W., ’02. “Varieties of Religious Experience.” London, 1902. ---- ---- ’09. “A Pluralistic Universe.” London, 1909. Jevons, ’10. “The Idea of God in Early Religions.” Cambridge, 1910. Johnstone, J., ’21. “The Mechanism of Life.” London, 1921. Jung, C. G., ’18 and ’20. “Psychology of the Unconscious.” London, 1918; “Analytical Psychology.” London, 1920. Lloyd-Morgan, ’23. “Emergent Evolution.” London, 1923. Lull, R. S., ’17. “Organic Evolution.” New York, 1917. M’Dougall, W., ’16. “Social Psychology” (10th Ed.). London, 1916. Nicoll, ’20. _In_ “Functional Nerve Disease” (Ed. H. Crichton Miller). Oxford, 1920. Prince, M., ’06. “The Dissociation of a Personality.” New York, 1906. ---- ---- ’16. “The Unconscious.” New York, 1916. Reinach, S., ’09. “Orpheus; a General History of Religions.” London, 1909. Rivers, W. H., ’20. “Instinct and the Unconscious.” Cambridge, 1920. Russell, Bertrand, ’17. “A Free Man’s Worship,” _in_ “Principles of Social Reconstruction.” London, 1917. Seward, A. C. (ed.), ’09. “Darwin and Modern Science.” Cambridge, 1909. Thouless, ’23. “Introduction to the Psychology of Religion.” Cambridge, 1923. Trotter, W., ’19. “Instincts of the Herd in Peace and War” (2nd Ed.). London, 1919. Turner, A. C, ’16. _In_ “Concerning Prayer.” By the author of “Pro Christo et Ecclesia” and Others. London, 1916. Underhill, E., ’20. “Essentials of Mysticism.” London, 1920. Webb, C. C. J., ’18. “God and Personality.” London, 1918. Wells, H. G., ’17. “God the Invisible King.” London, 1917. FOOTNOTES: [44] W. James, ’09, p. 21. [45] See Danysz, ’21. [46] See Danysz, ’21. [47] See Haldane, ’21; Thouless, ’23. [48] A confusion of thought easily arises here. It may be absolutely true that 2 and 2 make 4; we may be absolutely right in certain cases to tell a lie; or may find an expression of absolute beauty in some one lovely thing. But we may grow to find that same thing aesthetically unsatisfying; we can imagine a state of society in which it would never be right to lie; while our correct knowledge of elementary arithmetic is something very partial and incomplete considered in relation to mathematical truth as a whole.