Essays on the use and limit of the imagination in scienceTyndall, John
Science
Essays on the use and limit of the imagination in science
Tyndall, John
Science
Surely these notions represent an absurdity too monstrous to be
entertained by any sane mind. Let us, however, give them fair play. Let
us steady ourselves in front of the hypothesis, and, dismissing all
terror and excitement from our minds, let us look firmly into it with
the hard sharp eye of intellect alone. Why are these notions absurd,
and why should sanity reject them? The law of Relativity, of which we
have previously spoken, may find its application here. These Evolution
notions are absurd, monstrous, and fit only for the intellectual
gibbet in relation to the ideas concerning matter which were drilled
into us when young. Spirit and matter have ever been presented to us
in the rudest contrast, the one as all-noble, the other as all-vile.
But is this correct? Does it represent what our mightiest spiritual
teacher would call the Eternal Fact of the Universe? Upon the answer to
this question all depends. Supposing, instead of having the foregoing
antithesis of spirit and matter presented to our youthful minds, we had
been taught to regard them as equally worthy and equally wonderful; to
consider them in fact as two opposite faces of the self-same mystery.
Supposing that in youth we had been impregnated with the notion of
the poet Goethe, instead of the notion of the poet Young, looking
at matter, not as brute matter, but as ‘the living garment of God;’
do you not think that under these altered circumstances the law of
Relativity might have had an outcome different from its present one?
Is it not probable that our repugnance to the idea of primeval union
between spirit and matter might be considerably abated? Without this
total revolution of the notions now prevalent, the Evolution hypothesis
must stand condemned; but in many profoundly thoughtful minds such
a revolution has already taken place. They degrade neither member
of the mysterious duality referred to; but they exalt one of them
from its abasement, and repeal the divorce hitherto existing between
both. In substance, if not in words, their position as regards the
relation of spirit and matter is: ‘What God hath joined together let
not man put asunder.’ And with regard to the ages of forgetfulness
which lie between the unconscious life of the nebula and the conscious
life of the earth, it is, they would urge, but an extension of that
forgetfulness which preceded the birth of us all.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account