Essays, or discourses, vol. 3 (of 4) : $b Selected from the works of Feyjoo, and translated from the SpanishFeijoo, Benito Jerónimo
History
Essays, or discourses, vol. 3 (of 4) : $b Selected from the works of Feyjoo, and translated from the Spanish
Feijoo, Benito Jerónimo
Spanish essays -- Translations into English
XLVIII. But although it may be true, that the human affections of love,
vanity, and interest, assisted by the fictions of the poets, have been
the cause of deifying many men, still the system of Senior Branchini
cannot subsist in its general and extended sense, for the following
reasons. In the first place, because of the total exclusion it makes of
all sacred history, which, as we have already said, some poets might have
adulterated, in the same manner, and by the same means, they adulterated
profane ones. Secondly, because some of the fictions might have been
pure fictions, or mere fables, unmixed or unconnected with any history
whatever. Who can prevent a cunning artful man, that travels into a
remote region, from relating prodigies of some hero of his own country,
who never existed? and who afterwards could be answerable, that the
people of the country where he had spread the lie, should not adopt this
imaginary hero as a divinity? Thirdly, as a great portion of the gentiles
worshiped stars or planets, which they believed were animated, it is
probable, that many of their fictions alluded to no other object but
them. For example, when the adoration of the sun became an established
worship, they might, and it is natural that they should feign, that the
deity who animated it, had done such and such things, which bore no
relation to any man or circumstance whatever, but only to the imaginary
spirit.
XLIX. Lastly, the greatest part of the fables of the Gentiles, may
have had no other origin, than some mystical, moral, political, or
philosophical figure or representation, which their authors calculated
them to illustrate or inculcate. I mean that those who contrived and
fabricated them, had no other intention, than to represent obscurely,
and under the veil of fables, some theological mysteries, or some
philosophical, political, or moral maxims; but that afterwards, the
ignorance of the vulgar, by mistaking their intent and meaning, and by
construing and understanding them in a literal sense, came to form out of
them, a ridiculous theology and religion, which never entered the heads
of those who were the original authors of them. It is well known, the
Egyptians under hieroglyphicks, concealed not only their religion, but
even their history, policy, and philosophy, which were only laid open or
explained to their kings, and priests of the Sun. It is probable that
in imitation of the Egyptians, who in those days were venerated as the
most learned people in the world, many other nations adopted the same
practice; and it is also possible that the Egyptians themselves, might
have derived this custom from some other nation, who at one time might
have been superior to them in wisdom and learning; and it is likewise
possible, that this might have been a common practice in early antiquity.
It is certain, that there are vast numbers of the pagan fables, which are
capable of bearing a much more apt and commodious application to their
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account