Essays, or discourses, vol. 3 (of 4) : $b Selected from the works of Feyjoo, and translated from the SpanishFeijoo, Benito Jerónimo
History
Essays, or discourses, vol. 3 (of 4) : $b Selected from the works of Feyjoo, and translated from the Spanish
Feijoo, Benito Jerónimo
Spanish essays -- Translations into English
speaking of the bad government and depraved manners of Ephesus, which
was his own country; does not favour the least of compassion; for the
whole context, breathes nothing but indignation and resentment. By the
same letters we may perceive, that he was presumptuous in extreme, and
also arrogant, proud, and a contemner of the rest of mankind. How does
this correspond with the soft, and compassionate disposition, that is
attributed to him? Finally, it is a fact well established, that from his
disgust to, and loathing of mankind, he retired from the world, to lead a
solitary life in the mountains. All this, bespeaks a man of a perverse,
unsociable, and gloomy genius, and proves, that Heraclitus deserved the
character that had been given of him by Timon of Athens, which was that
of _a Misanthrope_; and means, _that he was an enemy to, or an abhorrer
of mankind_.
XIV. But whether Heraclitus was generally crying or lamenting, as is
commonly thought; or agreeable to my opinion of him, was continually
growling and snarling, it amounts to the same thing, for the use I
propose to make of the premises, which is to manifest, that Heraclitus
and Democritus, were excited by distinct affections, because their
attentions, were confined to distinct objects; and without entering into,
whether the lamentation, or indignation, whichever it shall be thought
fit to call it, of Heraclitus, whose apology I am not writing, was
justifiable, I maintain, that the laughter of Democritus was reasonable,
and not extravagant. Democritus viewed men on their ridiculous side,
and contemplated their absurdities, their follies, their ill-grounded
presumptions, their vain desires, and their useless occupations, all of
them, as objects worthy to be laughed at; for as Aristotle says, all
turpitude that does not occasion sadness, is laughable and ridiculous,
_turpitudo sine dolore_. The follies and vanities of man being then a
sort of turpitudes, which do not produce grief in him, but rather tend to
make him contented and happy in himself; are objects worthy to be laughed
at.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account