Essays, or discourses, vol. 3 (of 4) : $b Selected from the works of Feyjoo, and translated from the SpanishFeijoo, Benito Jerónimo
History
Essays, or discourses, vol. 3 (of 4) : $b Selected from the works of Feyjoo, and translated from the Spanish
Feijoo, Benito Jerónimo
Spanish essays -- Translations into English
LXXV. Neither is there the least foundation, for the tales of the
insolencies he exercised on the princes who became his prisoners. He
not only granted Hussein his life, but permitted him to retire and
live quiet wherever he liked best; but the imprudent distrust of this
unhappy man, cost him his life; for doubting of his safety, he fled from
his habitation, and hid himself in a cave, where a peasant finding him
concealed, put him to death. We are assured, that Tamerlan shed tears,
upon hearing of his catastrophe; but whether those tears were affected
or sincere, will ever continue problematical, as it does, of which
species those were, that Cæsar shed, upon hearing of the death of Pompey.
But, admitting that this grief was feigned, it proves at least, that
Tamerlan strove to preserve the appearance of his being a clement and
compassionate man, which is incompatible with the vulgar accounts of his
brutal and undisguised ferocity.
LXXVI. But after all, the most clamorous charge against Tamerlan remains
still to be replied to, and which we find greatly aggravated in all the
histories that have been written in Europe, where his conduct has been
canvassed, and relates to the cruel imprisonment he inflicted on Bajazet.
That unfortunate monarch, to whom, before he was defeated by Tamerlan,
they, on account of the rapidity of his conquests, gave the surname of
Gilderin, which signifies ray, or flash; after having for a long time
been the terror of Europe and Asia, and after innumerable conquests
gained over both the Christian and Mahometan princes whose territories
were in the neighbourhood of his dominions, was at length, miserably
defeated by Tamerlan, and made a prisoner in a great battle, where they
counted the number of combatants on each side, by hundreds of thousands.
Of this fact there is not the least doubt; the point in dispute, being
only, what was the sequel of the tragedy. All the European authors agree
unanimously, that Tamerlan, as soon as he had the Ottoman monarch in
his power, caused him to be put into an iron cage, which cage, at his
meal-times, he used to order to be placed at the bottom of his table,
from whence he fed him with bones and scraps that he threw to him, in
the same manner that you would feed a dog; and that he never had him
taken out of the cage, but to serve him as a block to tread on whenever
he mounted his horse; and for this purpose, he caused him to be laid
prostrate on the ground, and was used to set his foot on his shoulders.
They tell us further, that Bajazet lived some time in this miserable
state of humiliation; but that at length, he in a fit of rage and
despair, dashed his brains out against the bars of the cage. Some authors
add to this, another very heavy charge against Tamerlan, although they
don’t quote the antient authors from whom they took it, nor have I seen
any author who mentions it. The accusation is this, that Tamerlan caused
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account