Essays, or discourses, vol. 3 (of 4) : $b Selected from the works of Feyjoo, and translated from the SpanishFeijoo, Benito Jerónimo
History
Essays, or discourses, vol. 3 (of 4) : $b Selected from the works of Feyjoo, and translated from the Spanish
Feijoo, Benito Jerónimo
Spanish essays -- Translations into English
XXXV. This is what clearly appears from scripture; and there are
well-founded probabilities, that not only in the nations beforementioned,
but even in all others, (although the scripture, on account of their
history not being connected with that of the Israelites, does not
mention them) idolatry in the days of Moses, was radically established:
first, because the expressions the God of the Hebrews, and the God of
Israel, which so frequently occur in the scripture, indicate, that the
Israelites were the only people, who knew and worshiped the true God:
secondly, because it does not seem likely, that if in those days there
had been any other people who were faithful to their maker, that the
Divine Providence would not have contrived some means, to have had
their memories handed down to us, either by the pen of Moses, or that
of some other canonical writer; and also, some account of such men who
had flourished among them, as were eminent for their virtue; thirdly,
because, if in the nations who bordered on the Israelites, who saw their
worship, and were witnesses of the wonders God wrought in their favour,
the light of the true religion did not shine forth, how is it credible
that it should have prevailed in the distant ones?
XXXVI. Supposing then, that idolatry in the days of Moses, prevailed in
all, or the greatest part of the nations in the world, this supposition
gives great force to my argument against the system of the illustrious
Huet; for it is totally incredible, that all the idolatrous nations,
as if they did it by common consent, should at once forsake their
antient errors, for the purpose of forming another new system of false
religion, the object of which, was the adoration of Moses: the conclusion
then, that all the idols of the Gentiles were designed to represent
Moses, is a false one. I shall adduce in support of this assertion,
the following arguments: this change of worship, if it had ever taken
place, would without doubt, have begun with the nations next adjoining
to the Israelites, because these were the first who must have known of,
or experienced the wonders that were wrought by Moses, and from these
nations, together with the information of the wonders, the new idolatry
must have passed to the distant ones; but I say it is incredible, that
this change should ever have taken place in the neighbouring nations;
because these, together with their knowing of the wonders that were
wrought by Moses, must have also been acquainted with the principles
of the religion of the Hebrews; and must have known likewise, that the
Hebrews did not worship Moses as a deity; but that both Moses and they
worshiped an invisible God, in whose name, and by whose supreme power,
the prodigies were performed; and that, in the execution of them, Moses
acted as a mere instrument: it follows then, that in case these wonders
had made such an impression on their minds as to induce them to change
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account