Essays, or discourses, vol. 4 (of 4) : $b Selected from the works of Feyjoo, and translated from the SpanishFeijoo, Benito Jerónimo
Philosophy
Essays, or discourses, vol. 4 (of 4) : $b Selected from the works of Feyjoo, and translated from the Spanish
Feijoo, Benito Jerónimo
Spanish essays -- Translations into English
LXXXIX. I have sometimes observed, that those who attend on dying people
have been much dejected upon finding them in their last moments, make
some very irregular and extraordinary motions, and have been afraid and
believed that those agitations, had proceeded from some impatience that
had seized them. But let them not be uneasy on this account; because it
is most likely, that these motions are merely mechanical; and that in
case they should not be so, there is no mischief to be apprehended from
them; for in that proximate state to death, if people are not deprived
of their senses, the use of their reason is so feeble, or so confused,
that very little, if any, of that free will can be exercised by them
which is necessary to constitute sin, or at least any serious sin; for
no intoxicated man, nor any one at the instant he awakes from a profound
sleep, can be in a more stunned or stupified state, than a dying person
at such a crisis.
XC. Finally, both with respect to the matter of this appendix, as well
as with regard to that of the subject of this Essay, I shall proceed to
give a last, and most efficacious consolation, against the apprehension,
that the extreme pains of death are likely to endanger the loss of
people’s souls; for admitting that those pains were real, and as severe
as they are represented to be, is there any danger that the dying
person who is oppressed by them, should fall into the serious sin of
impatience, or that he should incur the guilt of any other mortal crime?
To this, I resolutely answer that he could not; for the same reasoning
that states the pain to be so insufferably intense, removes all the
hazard of sinning, because it must disturb the understanding to such
a degree, as to deprive a man of all free will. This is a consequence
resulting from all passions that are excessively violent, as is agreed
by all philosophers and theologians. Virgil, who had great judgment and
penetration in these matters, represents Chorœbus, who had been totally
deprived of his senses by grief for the imprisonment of his beloved
Cassandra, as divested of all free will or reflexion also, in the
following lines:
_Non tulit hanc speciem furiatâ mente Chorœbus,_
_Et sese medium injecit moriturus in agmen._
PARADOX X.
_The desire of posthumous fame is vain and futile._
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account