Essays, or discourses, vol. 4 (of 4) : $b Selected from the works of Feyjoo, and translated from the SpanishFeijoo, Benito Jerónimo
Philosophy
Essays, or discourses, vol. 4 (of 4) : $b Selected from the works of Feyjoo, and translated from the Spanish
Feijoo, Benito Jerónimo
Spanish essays -- Translations into English
VI. This division, after long and obstinate disputes, in which the
arguments were so nearly poised in equilibrium, that neither side could
claim the victory, in the course of time, opened the eyes of many,
and made them doubt whether they had not lightly, or even blindly,
admitted as articles of human faith, doctrines, that were uncertain,
and exposed to be terribly contested. They observed, that the arguments
with which each side attacked the opinions of their opponents, were
beyond comparison stronger, than the reasons with which they defended
their own. From hence they inferred, that both the one and the other
were evidently doubtful, and might very probably be false. This brought
to their remembrance the poor and neglected Solidina, and made them
reflect, that she proved all she advanced, by sensible and plain
demonstrations. This remark becoming every day more general, and more
adverted to by men of the first-rate ingenuity in the schools; they took
the matter into consideration, and the result of their deliberations
was, a determination to recall Solidina from her retirement, and to
bring her back to the city; which after having done with solemn pomp,
they erected a magnificent school for her, where she has continued to
teach from that time, with a reputation that has increased daily; and her
being favoured with the countenance and protection of some illustrious
personages of high rank, has greatly contributed to advance her credit,
and particularly the encouragement she has met with from the princes,
Galindo and Anglosio, who are both great lovers, and patrons of Solidina.
SECT. II.
VII. This History, which was printed in French, was given me to read by
a stranger who was on his travels; but as soon as I had read what I have
just related, he snatched the book out of my hands, and asked me if I
comprehended what I had read? The question gave me to understand, there
was something mysterious in the History, and that under the plain letter,
was conveyed some signification, different from what the words expressed.
I answered him, that I had not understood it in any other sense, than
what the language seemed to imply; but that if he would permit me to
read it over again with a little attention, I might perhaps be able to
comprehend its meaning. He gave me leave, and then upon reflection,
first on the nature of the doctrines it mentioned, although they were
not pointed out very clearly, and secondly, on the allusion of the names
given to the personages who were introduced into the scene, I found it
was not very difficult to decypher the riddle, which I interpreted in the
following manner.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account