Essays, or discourses, vol. 4 (of 4) : $b Selected from the works of Feyjoo, and translated from the SpanishFeijoo, Benito Jerónimo
Philosophy
Essays, or discourses, vol. 4 (of 4) : $b Selected from the works of Feyjoo, and translated from the Spanish
Feijoo, Benito Jerónimo
Spanish essays -- Translations into English
LXXX. I believe that from the blunder of mistaking two effects of the
same cause, the one for the cause, and the other for the effect, arose
the opinion, which is so common among medical people; that all fluxions
wherever they fall, the gout not excepted, descend from the head; and it
being very common, for those who are affected with acrid fluxions that
fall on any part of the body, to feel pains and heaviness in their heads;
I suppose that from thence sprung the notion, that all fluxions originate
in, and are derived from the brain; but there are not a few modern
physicians who are of a contrary sentiment, and in my opinion they are
right.
LXXXI. In the first place, I do not know why the vicious humours, from
whence the matter of fluxions are derived, should make the grand circuit
through the head, before they fall on any particular part that is at a
distance from it; as they could, by being mixed with the blood in their
circulation through the veins and arteries, be derived immediately from
them, on any member or part of the body.
LXXXII. Secondly, if such a vast quantity of humour, as is discharged by
some fluxions, was to be lodged in the brain, it seems to me that it must
render a man quite stupid, and that organ incapable of exercising any of
its functions.
LXXXIII. Thirdly, it is not easy to point out the channel, through which
the humour passes from the interior part of the head. Many pretend to
say it passes through the Ethmoides, or Os Criboso; but Sneider denies
this, for that you cannot find any cavities or perforations in this
bone, through which those humours could flow, and especially if they are
pituitous and clammy, as the antients supposed them to be; and to this we
may add, that this bone is entirely covered or lined by the meninges, and
the interior tunic of the nose. It is true, as Doctor Matinez observes
in his treatise on anatomy, that its upper part is very porous, and that
from thence it came to be called the os criboso, or spungy bone; but as
these spungy pores do not pervade the whole bone, and are not pierced
through it, setting aside the obstacle it would meet with from the
membranes or tunics that surround it, the humour could not pass that way.
If it is insisted, that it flows through the nervous ducts, I ask how it
comes not to be attended with obstructions, that must produce dangerous
consequences?
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account