Essays, or discourses, vol. 4 (of 4) : $b Selected from the works of Feyjoo, and translated from the SpanishFeijoo, Benito Jerónimo
Philosophy
Essays, or discourses, vol. 4 (of 4) : $b Selected from the works of Feyjoo, and translated from the Spanish
Feijoo, Benito Jerónimo
Spanish essays -- Translations into English
XIII. This distinction is the fundamental maxim, by which the modern
philosophers maintain their rejection of all the sensible qualities,
which are assigned by Aristotle and his followers to objects; and they
carry the matter so far, that they will positively assert to you, that
neither snow is white, nor charcoal black, nor a bell sonorous, nor a
flower fragrant; and if you mean to express by these denominations,
intrinsic qualities, or such as proceed from some accidental intrinsic
form contained in objects; they will not allow such descriptions of
things to be good and valid, but only so far as they signify certain
determined impressions, which by means of the physical and corporeal
impulse of the insensible particles of matter, are made on our organs,
which are of the same use to us, to enable us to chuse the good, and
avoid the pernicious, as our knowledge of the real intrinsic forms would
be. They proceed to assert, that men would equally abstain from eating
arsenic, if they believed the moderns, who say this mineral kills by
dissolving the blood, by the rapid motion of its particles; as they
would by believing Aristotle, who imputes all the mischief it occasions
to be the effect of a venomous quality existing in the arsenic, and
that they would be equally anxious to acquire gold, by believing the
moderns, who say its brilliant yellow hue is the effect of a determined
impression made by the light on the retina, where it appears reflected
in that colour, from the particular texture of the insensible particles
of the gold, as they would, by believing Aristotle, who says, the colour
proceeds from an accidental form, inherent in the gold itself. I know
very well, that a learned philosopher said, a little while ago, that
the ladies had great reason to complain of Descartes, for having taken
from their faces that delicate smooth whiteness which makes them look so
tempting, and for having placed it in their admirer’s eyes. But although
this may do very well as a joke, it is certain, that the charm has an
equal effect to make them appear desirable, whether it is stamped on the
eyes, by the particular reflection, which, by the determined texture of
the insensible particles of the skin, is made by the light, or whether
it is produced by the intrinsic quality, which the Aristotelicans assign
as the cause of colours; and I much doubt, whether to this day, the
Carthesian philosophy has served any man as a preservative, against the
venom of that sweet poison, which we call beauty.
SECT. IV.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account