Essays, or discourses, vol. 4 (of 4) : $b Selected from the works of Feyjoo, and translated from the Spanish — John Shaqi
Essays, or discourses, vol. 4 (of 4) : $b Selected from the works of Feyjoo, and translated from the SpanishFeijoo, Benito Jerónimo
Philosophy
Essays, or discourses, vol. 4 (of 4) : $b Selected from the works of Feyjoo, and translated from the Spanish
Feijoo, Benito Jerónimo
Spanish essays -- Translations into English
XLVII. If of our own proper genus, we know nothing with certainty, what
must our knowledge be of others? The genus most immediately next to our
own, is that of plants, and in this, notwithstanding our proximity, we
can discern nothing but our ignorance; for we cannot venture even by
conjectures, to point out the constitutive difference between them.
This is not only invisible to the eyes of evidence, but impalpable to
the essays of opinion. We commonly define the genus of a plant, by the
term insensible living entity. But the word insensible, which we use
to describe the difference, only signifies want of sensibility; and
a positive entity, such as a plant is, cannot be ascertained by a
negative. Besides this, as we observed before, it is somewhat doubtful,
whether plants are, or are not sensible. We call them also _living
vegetables_. But by this idea, we do not assign to the plant a different
nature from the animal, for that this also is a living vegetable. If I
am told, that the difference consists, in that the life of the animal
is vegetative and sensitive, and that that of the plant is purely
vegetative, I reply, that the adverb _purely_ in this place, signifies
nothing but the want of sensitive life, which is meant to be expressed
in the extreme, and a want, cannot be made use of as a descriptive term,
to point out the constitutive difference between positive entities.
Nor will it be of any use to answer, that the term want, means a want
or defect in the mode of explanation, and does not apply to the thing
signified; for till it can be ascertained what the thing signified is,
we must remain totally in the dark; and it is also false, that this
term _want_, is not applicable to the thing signified; for negative
expressions are positive with respect to the thing signified, when they
are used to deny any imperfection in the object they relate to; for
the want of an imperfection, is the want of a want, it being certain,
that all imperfection consists in the want of positive perfection;
for which reasons these words, infinity, immensity, indivisibility,
although negative with respect to the mode of expression, are positive
with respect to the thing signified; but the term insensible, or
insensibility, applied to a plant, signifies want of perfection, and thus
is negative with respect to the thing signified.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account