Essays towards the history of paintingCallcott, Maria, Lady
History
Essays towards the history of painting
Callcott, Maria, Lady
Painting -- History
Pacuvius, the poet and tragedian, is named as another great painter in
the time of the Republic. He lived about sixty years later than Fabius
Pictor, and was a native of Brundusium. As the nephew of Ennius, his
works would have been sure of a favourable notice from all the wise
and polished Romans of his time; but, by what we are told of them,
they do not appear to have required indulgence. He painted the Temple
of Hercules in the cattle market in Rome, and the pictures are said to
have given dignity to the art itself.
But a singular use was made of painting by the Roman heroes. Their
inordinate love of military fame discovered a mode of feeding that
ruling passion by means of this charming art; and it appears that
Valerius Maximus Messala was the first to adopt a practice of
exhibiting pictures of his own actions, which became afterwards pretty
common, though condemned by some of the chief men of the Republic.
Messala then caused a picture to be hung up in the Portico Hostilia,
representing the Battle of Messana[50], where he had vanquished both
the Carthaginians and Hiero of Syracuse, who had joined his former
enemies to resist the invasion of his country by the Romans.
By means of this picture, Messala kept himself before the eyes of the
people, in the situation best calculated to further his views whenever
he should be a candidate for the magistracy. Instead of sitting himself
in the market-place, dressed in the white robe of humility, and
pointing to his wounds, as Coriolanus says, to
“Show them the scars that I would hide,
As if I had received them for the hire
Of their breath only,”
the picture told the story of his achievements to the best advantage,
and perhaps placed his personal and party enemies in doubtful
situations or in disgrace.
That some injurious effects were occasionally produced by the practice
is certain, from the displeasure entertained by Scipio Africanus
against his brother Lucius Scipio, for placing in the Capitol
a picture of the battle near Sardes, which won him the title of
Asiaticus, but in which, his nephew, the son of Africanus, was taken
prisoner.
Again, Scipio Emilianus was highly offended at the display of a picture
of the taking of Carthage, exhibited in the market-place by Lucius
Hostilius Mancinus. It appears that Mancinus was the first to enter
Carthage on the taking of that city: and, on his return to Rome, being
desirous of the consulship, he had a picture painted representing the
strong situation of the town, with its fortifications, and all the
machines employed in the attack and defence, besides the actions of the
besiegers, in which care was taken that those of Mancinus should be
most conspicuous. This he hung up in the Forum, and, seating himself
by it, he explained to the people all the parts of the picture,
particularly those in which he was concerned, in such a manner, that
he won their good will, and gained the consulship at the very next
election.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account