<<<<<Corollary--Hence it follows that the human mind, when it
perceives things after the common order of nature, has not an
adequate but only a confused and fragmentary knowledge of
itself, of its own body, and of external bodies. For the mind
does not know itself, except in so far as it perceives the ideas
of the modifications of body (II. xxiii.). It only perceives
its own body (II. xix.) through the ideas of the modifications of
body (II. xxiii.). It only perceives its own body (II. xix.)
through the ideas of the modifications, and only perceives
external bodies through the same means; thus, in so far as it has
such ideas of modification, it has not an adequate knowledge of
itself (II. xxix.), nor of its own body (II. xxvii.), nor of
external bodies (II. xxv.), but only a fragmentary and confused
knowledge thereof (II. xxviii. and note). Q.E.D.
*****Note--I say expressly, that the mind has not an adequate but
only a confused knowledge of itself, its own body, and of
external bodies, whenever it perceives things after the common
order of nature; that is, whenever it is determined from without,
namely, by the fortuitous play of circumstance, to regard this
or that; not at such times as it is determined from within, that
is, by the fact of regarding several things at once, to
understand their points of agreement, difference, and contrast.
Whenever it is determined in anywise from within, it regards
things clearly and distinctly, as I will show below.
XXX. We can only have a very inadequate knowledge of the duration
of our body.
>>>>>Proof--The duration of our body does not depend on its
essence (II. Ax. i.), nor on the absolute nature of God (I.
xxi.). But (I. xxviii.) it is conditioned to exist and operate
by causes, which in their turn are conditioned to exist and
operate in a fixed and definite relation by other causes, these
last again being conditioned by others, and so on to infinity.
The duration of our body therefore depends on the common order of
nature, or the constitution of things. Now, however a thing may
be constituted, the adequate knowledge of that thing is in God,
in so far as he has the ideas of all things, and not in so far as
he has the idea of the human body only (II. ix. Cor.).
Wherefore the knowledge of the duration of our body is in God
very inadequate, in so far as he is only regarded as constituting
the nature of the human mind; that is (II. xi. Cor.), this
knowledge is very inadequate to our mind. Q.E.D.
XXXI. We can only have a very inadequate knowledge of the
duration of particular things external to ourselves.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account