Europe and the Faith: "Sine auctoritate nulla vita"Belloc, Hilaire
History
Europe and the Faith: "Sine auctoritate nulla vita"
Belloc, Hilaire
Catholic Church; Europe -- History
He sees that the stand made by St. Thomas was not very important in its
special claims, and was probably (taken as an isolated action)
unreasonable. But he soon gets to see, as he reads and as he notes the
rapid and profound transformation of all civilization which was taking
place in that generation, that St. Thomas was standing out for a
principle, ill clothed in his particular plea, but absolute in its
general appreciation: the freedom of the Church. He stood out in
particular for what _had_ been the concrete symbols of the Church’s
liberty in the past. The direction of his actions was everything,
whether his symbol was well or ill chosen. The particular customs might
go. But to challenge the new claims of civil power at that moment was
to save the Church. A movement was afoot which might have then
everywhere accomplished what was only accomplished in parts of Europe
four hundred years later, to wit, a dissolution of the unity and the
discipline of Christendom.
St. Thomas had to fight on ground chosen by the enemy; he fought and he
resisted in the spirit dictated by the Church. He fought for no
dogmatic point, he fought for no point to which the Church of five
hundred years earlier or five hundred years later would have attached
importance. He fought for things which were purely temporal
arrangements; which had indeed until quite recently been the guarantee
of the Church’s liberty, but which were in his time upon the turn of
becoming negligible. _But the spirit in which he fought was a
determination that the Church should never be controlled by the civil
power_, and the spirit against which he fought was the spirit which
either openly or secretly believes the Church to be an institution
merely human, and therefore naturally subjected, as an inferior, to the
processes of the monarch’s (or, worse, the politician’s) law.
A Catholic sees, as he reads the story, that St. Thomas was obviously
and necessarily to lose, in the long run, every concrete point on which
he had stood out, and yet he saved throughout Europe the ideal thing
for which he was standing out. A Catholic perceives clearly why the
enthusiasm of the populace rose: the guarantee of the plain man’s
healthy and moral existence against the threat of the wealthy, and the
power of the State—the self-government of the general Church, had been
defended by a champion up to the point of death. For the morals
enforced by the Church are the guarantee of freedom.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account