Europe and the Faith: "Sine auctoritate nulla vita"Belloc, Hilaire
History
Europe and the Faith: "Sine auctoritate nulla vita"
Belloc, Hilaire
Catholic Church; Europe -- History
Thus the fact that the Venerable Bede takes for granted permanent
pirate settlements (established as regular, if small, states), all the
way along the North Sea coast from the northern part of Britain in
which he wrote, brought down to the central south by Southampton Water,
is a powerful or rather a conclusive argument in favor of the existence
of such states some time before he wrote. It is not credible that a man
of this weight would write as he does without solid tradition behind
him; and he tells us that the settlers on this coast of Britain came
from three lowland Frisian tribes, German and Danish, called Saxons,
Jutes and Angles.
The first name “Saxon” was _at that time_ the name of certain pirates
inhabiting two or three small islands on the coasts between the Elbe
and the Rhone. [Footnote: The name has retained a vague significance
for centuries and is now attached to a population largely Slavonic and
wholly Protestant, south of Berlin—hundred of miles from its original
seat.] Ptolemy puts these “Saxons” two hundred years earlier, just
beyond the mouth of the Elbe; the Romans knew them as scattered pirates
in the North Sea, irritating the coasts of Gaul and Britain for
generations. The name later spread to a large island confederation: but
that was the way with German tribal names. The German tribal names do
not stand for fixed races or even provinces, but for chance
agglomerations which suddenly rise and as suddenly disappear. The local
term, “Saxon,” in the fifth and sixth century had nothing to do with
the general term, “Saxon,” applied to all northwest of the Germanies
two hundred years and more afterwards. These pirates then provided
small bands of fighting men under chieftains who founded small
organized governments north of the Thames Estuary, at the head of
Southampton Water, and on the Sussex coast, when they may or may not
have found (but more probably _did_ find) existing settlements of their
own people already established as colonies by the Romans. The chiefs
very probably captured the Roman fiscal organization of the place, but
seem rapidly to have degraded society by their barbaric incompetence.
They learnt no new language, but continued to talk that of their
original seat on the Continent, which language was split up into a
number of local dialects, each of which was a mixture of original
German and adopted Greek, Latin and even Celtic words.
Of the Jutes we know nothing; there is a mass of modern guess work
about them, valueless like all such stuff. We must presume that they
were an insignificant little tribe who sent out a few mercenaries for
hire; but they had the advantage of sending out the first, for the
handful of mercenaries whom the Roman British called into Kent were by
all tradition Jutish. The Venerable Bede also bears witness to an
isolated Jutish settlement in the Meon Valley near Southampton Water,
comparable to the little German colonies established by the Romans at
Bayeux in Normandy and near Rennes.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account