Europe—whither bound? (Quo vadis Europa?) : $b being letters of travel from the capitals of Europe in the year 1921Graham, Stephen
History
Europe—whither bound? (Quo vadis Europa?) : $b being letters of travel from the capitals of Europe in the year 1921
Graham, Stephen
Europe -- Description and travel
It is of little use going on producing
great quantities of goods for which there is at present no market, and
no use producing above the European market price. It would be truer to
say that the strikes are partly the result of the depression. Most of
the strikes have been caused by "cuts" in wages. Wages have been
sought to be reduced in order to turn out cheaper products and so be
able to compete with other cheap European goods. The secret of the
obduracy of the coal-owners has lain in the fact that British coal
costs more than the world-price per ton. The difference in price could
be put on to the private consumer but there are limits to his means of
purchasing. It is impossible to do more trade with the consumer. The
main coal business is with the factory and the ship, and these compete
in world-markets for their own business. All want to keep the cost of
production low in order to compete with the countries of low exchange.
The European exchange is proving to be the most vital matter for
English trade. Its irregularities reflect the irregularities of our
Europe and they must be met. An equality of values must somehow be
obtained, and it could be obtained in a spirit of general friendship
and good-will. Great sacrifices would be necessary from rich people of
all the nations concerned, and large schemes of revenge and punishment
would have to be abandoned. But in doing so we should all save one
another; in not doing so we are likely all to ruin one another.
LETTERS OF TRAVEL
XVII. FROM PARIS
France is the mainspring of the new mechanism, and Paris the control.
That is why I chose to go to Paris last--so that all, even London,
could be related to her. The initiative in European politics is taken
by France and she has the most active policy. Most other States wait
to see what France is doing and shape their policies accordingly.
London is generally in opposition to Paris, but English action is so
sluggish and so independable that even those States who loathe the new
France are obliged to assume that England does not really count. With
the exception of Greece, England is not giving active support or
practical sympathy to any other country in Europe. But France backs
Poles and Turks and Hungarians and Serbs, and is carrying out a grand
scheme of world-policy clearly--if not very effectively.
France has made great progress since the war. Alone among the warring
powers in this respect she stands higher than she did in 1914. She
stands higher than she has done at any time since the great Napoleon.
The Government it is true is in direful need of money, and has always a
difficult political path to tread, but both the French individual and
the nation as a whole have gained enormously. Peoples and governments
are too often confused, and the plight of M. Briand sometimes deceives
people as to the position of France.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account