Europe—whither bound? (Quo vadis Europa?) : $b being letters of travel from the capitals of Europe in the year 1921Graham, Stephen
History
Europe—whither bound? (Quo vadis Europa?) : $b being letters of travel from the capitals of Europe in the year 1921
Graham, Stephen
Europe -- Description and travel
"France is bankrupt," says a leading publicist, in one of the London
reviews. But the French people are not bankrupt. Far from it. On the
average they are a very rich people. Even in the devastated areas
there has been a rapid financial recovery due to the hard work and
perseverance of the returned inhabitants. The constant talk about the
ruined North of France has been more a matter of propaganda than
verity. Though war was not carried into Yorkshire and Lancashire, it
is quite clear that England is to-day in a much more ruinous state than
France. The French drove our sentimental politicians through carefully
chosen routes and showed them the grand spectacle of war's ruins. And
they were impressed. But there is ruin which cannot be seen from a car
window. An economic dry-rot at the heart of a country is more terrible
than excoriations on the surface.
In Paris you realize at once a remarkable change in atmosphere after
London. The barometer has risen. It suddenly feels better to be
alive. There is a sense of something in the air; something doing.
Yes, the people are smarter and cleaner; their eyes are brighter. The
streets are better kept. _Amour propre_ is expressed in all the shop
windows, in the manners of 'bus conductors, waiters, salesmen, chance
acquaintances, in the tone of the Press. What is the matter? Can it
be that Paris has become first-class and London has ceased to be
first-class? Paris was not like this in 1913. She was decidedly
down-at-heel. There was no particular verve or dignity in the ways of
Parisians. They carried on in a second-rate way in a civilization
which to the general European traveller seemed inferior both to London
and Berlin.
Something has intervened, and that something is not merely war but
victory. Victory has intervened and has fed the French soul with the
thing which it required. We know now more of what France was like
before 1870. Evidently for fifty years she has lived in a state of
depression and spiritual thraldom, and now she has escaped and is more
herself. France has recovered her national pride and
self-consciousness. She has expanded. Increase of territory and of
national interests has given to French self-consciousness more room,
and you behold the opposite type of development to that which is in
process in Germany, where national self-consciousness has been turned
in on itself. That is why it is good to be alive in Paris and not so
good in London or Berlin.
It is possible to be winning and still remain down-hearted, but this is
not the case at Paris. The supposed fear of Germany is only political
bluff. France fears no Germans. She fears nobody. Perhaps she ought
to fear--for the far future. But she has always had a belief in
herself and her way of doing things and an inbred contempt for other
races as for barbarians, and it has only needed this colossal victory
in a world-war to set her on her pedestal of fame once more.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account