Europe—whither bound? (Quo vadis Europa?) : $b being letters of travel from the capitals of Europe in the year 1921Graham, Stephen
History
Europe—whither bound? (Quo vadis Europa?) : $b being letters of travel from the capitals of Europe in the year 1921
Graham, Stephen
Europe -- Description and travel
Il nous ramene aux reves ineptes des Fourier et des Cabet, effacant de
la surface de ce pauvre globe terraque toutes les barrieres,
aplanissant avec intrepiditee les plus grands obstacles, niant le fait
concret des nationalites, de plus en plus positif pourtant a mesure que
progresse la civilisation, et saluant deja l'aurore du jour ou
Ce globe deplume, sans barbe et sans cheveux
Comme un grand potiron roulera dans les cieux
M. Britling nous ramene donc de cent ans en arriere, au mauvais
socialisme primitif de l'epoque romantique. Il ressuscite de
poussiereuses momies.
By denying the possibility of realizing the dream of a world-State or a
collective European State, the Frenchman speaks for his country.
France regards the development of European history with simple realism
and without ideals. The only weak link in her chain-mail is the belief
in the civilizing mission of France. If there is no progress why have
a mission to civilize?
Perhaps the religious sentimentalism of Western politicians was a
revelation to French statesmen. France, for all her cosmopolitanism,
has always been badly informed as to the life of the people in England
and America. Something of the general astonishment was voiced by
Clemenceau, if the story of him is true. He is supposed to have said
of Wilson: "He is an excellent man, but he thinks he's Jesus Christ."
In France all excellence is excellence of form. The idea of the growth
of the soul and of germinal excellence of any kind is foreign. For our
part in England and America we understand little of form. France
therefore can upon occasion show the world something which no one can
deny to be excellent.
The Parisian can very well say in London or New York: "You have much
that is large and fine, but it is clear that you do not understand Art
and have very little taste. In France we do things better than this."
He does not put his _poilu inconnu_ in the depths of a cathedral in
order to bring an unbelieving crowd into the house of God, but puts him
in the public way under the Arc de Triomphe. He does not say that the
soldier died for King and Country, and then mutilate a text--"Greater
love hath no man than this," but he inscribes--"_Ici repose un soldat
francais mort pour la patrie_," and leaves the living to make their own
reflections. His Paris is a city of statues and gardens but it is all
dignified, it is all in good taste. Even the houses and the shops
conform to the general idea of the fitness and elegance of Paris.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account