Europe—whither bound? (Quo vadis Europa?) : $b being letters of travel from the capitals of Europe in the year 1921Graham, Stephen
History
Europe—whither bound? (Quo vadis Europa?) : $b being letters of travel from the capitals of Europe in the year 1921
Graham, Stephen
Europe -- Description and travel
It was in doubt for a while before the war, but now it is sure--all the
world must learn French; if it cannot speak French it must at least
think French. French is the universal medium of civilization and good
manners. The emissaries of France in every country of Europe carry
France's civilizing mission and tell the foreign statesmen of the young
States what to do and how to do it. As England sends missionaries to
spread the gospel of Christ so France sends hers to spread the gospel
of France.
The sense of this glorious activity comes back to the heart and the
brain at Paris, and it is small wonder that steps are lighter and eyes
brighter.
If only the Government could fill its exchequer! France lives by
loans, and even an interest of six per cent free of income-tax will not
tempt the citizens to invest sufficient money to pay the Government's
way. The Government cannot raise its revenue by taxes. An Englishman
slavishly pays half his income in taxes, but not a Frenchman. It is
difficult to get five per cent. And there one comes suddenly upon
France's greatest vice and weakness--avarice.
It is France's penuriousness and meanness and her exaggerated thrift
that stands most in the way of her material greatness now. The
Government needs to spend a great deal more than it used to do before
the war, must spend it, if it is to do the best for France. France has
the consciousness of being the greatest power in Europe, and she has
the will to play the role of the greatest power, and she is called upon
to do things in style.
France is romantic in ambition, she is vivacious and happy and
dignified, till she is called upon to pay anything. Then the
Frenchwoman in the French nation reveals herself. The eyes become
small, the lips thin, the cheeks pale, the whole being shrinks into
itself and goes on the defensive.
France wishes to run this new Europe which has come into being, on the
old lines, playing with hatreds and jealousies and conflicting
interests as a chess-player with his pieces. The idealists of England
and America want to eradicate the jealousies and hatreds and run the
same new Europe on principles of pure love. France says human nature
never changes. Britain and America say human nature has progressed
with them and it must progress similarly in Europe. France's final
answer is laughter. So constant is France's amusement at the expense
of the Anglo-Saxon that she has adopted the _sourire ironique_ as
something necessary to typical beauty in a Frenchman.
It is, therefore, not surprising that M. Octave Duplessis in the
"Figaro" should find that characteristic work of H. G. Wells, the
"Salvaging of Civilization," quite ridiculous.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account