Europe—whither bound? (Quo vadis Europa?) : $b being letters of travel from the capitals of Europe in the year 1921Graham, Stephen
History
Europe—whither bound? (Quo vadis Europa?) : $b being letters of travel from the capitals of Europe in the year 1921
Graham, Stephen
Europe -- Description and travel
I visited Strasbourg, now outwardly Frenchified, but inwardly German
enough. At the time of the commencement of the armistice and the
German retirement "Simplicimus" published a picture of a "Farewell to
Strasbourg." It was a stormy sunset and late evening, and the black
silhouette of the very memorable cathedral, the stark and ragged
grandeur of that cathedral and its spire which looks as if nothing
exists in Strasbourg but it, stood for the significance of the city.
Some German horse-soldier symbolized the last to go, and lifting his
hat, took one last look at the place, and said, "_Auf wiedersehen_."
And Alsace became French once more.
What a thing to graft two French provinces to the living body of
Germany for fifty years and then dispart, when the blood has learned to
flow strongly from the new flesh to the heart! You feel the break, the
interruption, when you go there now.
And now the same two provinces, heavily Germanized, are re-grafted back
to the original flesh of France. It would be absurd to say that the
circulation of the blood and the spirit have been re-established at
once. There is a great deal of mortification in Alsace and Lorraine.
It will be a long while before French life permeates the whole and
surges through every vein. Meanwhile the new process of
Frenchification proceeds.
We seldom hear that the Germans dare claim to hold Alsace and Lorraine
on any grounds, and yet, in fact, quietly and persistently, they do
dare. It is frequently urged in conversation that if a plebiscite had
been taken in the two provinces, the majority would have been found
desirous of remaining under German rule. This, no doubt, is partly
vanity, and springs from belief in the supposed preferability of German
civilization to French civilization--even French people who knew what
it was to live under a French as well as a German regime might prefer
the latter as more efficient and comfortable and up-to-date. But the
belief that a plebiscite would have gone in German favour is based even
more on the German population and on the strong business interests
which link the industrial part with the industrial whole. Alsace and
Lorraine through commercial development had become an exceedingly
important constituent of modern Germany before the war. Germany,
moreover, claims to have converted them from poor departments of France
to wealthy industrial communities.
Naturally no one on the Allied side of the peace-table ever dreamed of
considering such arguments. And they are so lacking in practical
cogency that they find no place in the current consideration of modern
Europe. They are useless arguments for a Germany who lost the war, and
they are assumed to be quite dead. Germany has enough trouble to save
Westphalia and Silesia and the Ruhr valley, let alone think about the
irrecoverables of the war. She might as well argue that the fleet she
sank at Scapa Flow should be restored to her as think of Alsace now.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account