Francis Rieger, _Cracow_ Johann Gotthilf, President Criminal Court, _Prussia_ Count Oscar Roswadowski, _Austria_ Baron J. Wallish, _Ditto_ Baron M. Lyncker, Lieut., _Prussia_ Baron Mezenthin, Major, _Ditto_ Ivan A. Roiz, _Brazils, S. America_ Nicholas Arnault, _Paris_ Guiseppe Weyher, _Trieste_ August Navez, Lieut., _Belgium_ Wilhelm Lommatsch, _Saxony_ Baron A. Ledderer, Colonel, _Austria_ Von Kutzl, Lieut., _Ditto_ Von Bovelmo, Lieut., _Ditto_ Baron Huelberg, Lieut., _Ditto_ "P.S.--We, the undersigned, cannot vouch for the exactitude of each particular in the four cases, related above, not having been at Gräfenberg during their occurrence; but we are happy to state our conviction and experience to be fully in favor of this mode of treatment. E. Hallman, M. D., _Berlin_ Peter Wilson, Writer to the Signet, _Scotland_ Horatio Greenhough, _U. S._ A. Schrotterick, M. D., _Norway_ Francisco Bazan, _de la Province de Seville en Espana_, M. D. J. M. Gutterieg Estrada, late Plenipotentiary to the Court of London, from _Mexico_ C. M. Mecker, _America_ R. L. Jones, _Luton, Bedfordshire_ A. J. Colvin, _Albany, N. Y._ A. F. Webster, R. N., _Battle Abbey, Sussex_ W. Cybulvo, M. D., _Prague_ Dr. Hempin, _Prussia_ W. Murray, _Monaghan, Ireland_ W. S. Ellis, _Middle Temple, London_ T. H. Cohen, _London_" * * * * * In 1845 a work of a very different tendency appeared, which, though approving of the hydropathic treatment in itself, denounced Priessnitz's application of it, and calumniated him personally in the most unwarrantable and groundless manner. The author was R. H. Graham, M. D.; and so unpardonable was his attack on Priessnitz that it drew forth the following letter. "To the Editor of the London Times, "_Gräfenberg, 2nd February, 1845_. "Sir.--We, the undersigned British and Americans, who have resided here for periods varying from three months to two years and upwards, and who consequently have had ample opportunities of acquiring correct information, deem it our duty publicly to assert that a work, entitled 'A true Report of the Water-cure, by Robert Hay Graham, M.D.' abounds in gross exaggerations, mis-statements, and calumnies respecting Priessnitz. It would lengthen this document too much to go into a detailed repetition of all those portions of Dr. Graham's work which we could contradict; we therefore refrain from noticing any in particular: it will be sufficient to say, that _from personal observations_, we can deny several of Dr. Graham's allegations, and, from information upon which we _can_ rely, we are convinced that many more are totally devoid of foundation.