Evolution: Its nature, its evidence, and its relation to religious thought — John Shaqi
Evolution: Its nature, its evidence, and its relation to religious thoughtLeConte, Joseph
Religion
Evolution: Its nature, its evidence, and its relation to religious thought
LeConte, Joseph
Evolution (Biology); Evolution (Biology) -- Religious aspects; Religion and science
THE RELATION OF LOUIS AGASSIZ TO THE THEORY OF EVOLUTION.
General misunderstanding on this subject--Necessary to give
sketch of history of the idea--Greeks, Lucretius, Swedenborg,
and Kant--First scientific presentation by Lamarck--General
character of Lamarck’s views--Failed, and rightly so--Next,
Chambers’s “Vestiges of Creation”--Its general character--
Failed, and rightly so--Some think this unfortunate--Why
not so--An obstacle must be removed and a basis laid 32
_The obstacle removed_--Old views in regard to forces--
Correlation of forces established--But vital force considered
exception--Therefore living forms also supposed exception
to mode of origin of other forms--Then vital forces also
correlated--Therefore, _a priori_ probable that living forms
also correlated with other forms as to mode of origin--Thus
obstacle removed 35
_The basis laid_--Agassiz laid inductive _basis_ of evolution,
although he refused to build--He established the laws of
evolution and perfected the method of comparison--Importance
of method discussed--The method of _notation_--The method
of experiment--The difficulty of applying these to life
phenomena--Method of comparison shown--(1) In Taxonomic
series--(2) In Ontogenic series--(3) In Phylogenic series
--Cuvier the great worker by comparison in the Taxonomic
series--Agassiz in the Ontogenic and Phylogenic--Agassiz
also established the three laws of evolution given in previous
chapter--Thus he laid foundation--Why he did not build--
Supposed identity of evolution and materialism--The obstacle
being removed and the basis laid, when evolution again brought
forward it was universally accepted, because the world was
prepared--Place of Agassiz and Darwin compared--Formal
science _vs._ physical science--Illustrated by relation of
Kepler to Newton--Relation of Agassiz to time cosmos similar
to that of Kepler to space cosmos--So Darwin to Newton--
Some reflections on the above--Gravitation is the law of
space cosmos--Evolution of time cosmos--Of the divine
spheral music gravitation is the chordal harmony and evolution
the melody 37
PART II.
_EVIDENCES OF THE TRUTH OF EVOLUTION._
CHAPTER I.
GENERAL EVIDENCES OF EVOLUTION AS A UNIVERSAL LAW.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account