Evolution of Life and Form: Four lectures delivered at the twenty-third anniversary meeting of the Theosophical Society at Adyar, Madras, 1898 — John Shaqi
Evolution of Life and Form: Four lectures delivered at the twenty-third anniversary meeting of the Theosophical Society at Adyar, Madras, 1898Besant, Annie
Religion
Evolution of Life and Form: Four lectures delivered at the twenty-third anniversary meeting of the Theosophical Society at Adyar, Madras, 1898
Besant, Annie
Evolution; Life -- Origin; Theosophy
disappeared in the great flood of barbaric invasions, underneath the
whirlpool caused by the ruins of the Roman Empire, and later on,
underneath the wreckage of that same Empire with its new centre in
Constantinople. The invasions of barbarians, both from the East and the
North, sweeping over the European continent, brought ignorance in the
wake of barbaric conquest. The result was that night came down upon
knowledge and thick darkness enveloped the lands which were to be the
nursery of a new civilisation. When the Sun of science again began to rise
upon the Western world, it presented itself in a form which was alien,
nay, which was more than alien, which was hostile to the dominant religion
of the time. It came from the children of Islâm. It came from those who
recognised Muhammed as their Prophet. From the Muslim schools of Arabia
came the first teachers of modern science to Europe. True, they were
really by their intellectual ancestry descended from the thought of
Greece. They drew their inspiration from the school of Plato through the
Neo-Platonists; they reproduced the ideas of Porphyry and Ptolemy, and of
other Grecian and Egyptian thinkers, Neo-Platonic and even Gnostic. But
they threw over it the garb of Islâm, they presented it in the form of
Arabic thought. The result of this was that, as it made its way into Spain
in the wake of the conquering Moors, as it came with those who drove out
of the Southern Peninsula the rule of the Spanish Christian monarchy, so
the first aspect of science to Christians was an aspect of hostility. It
came as an invading enemy and not as an illuminant to all. Hence conflict
arose; some who were within the limits of the mighty Church of Rome,
touched by a longing for the new learning, stretched out their hands to
take the gifts that science was bringing. These men were regarded with
suspicion, nay, with more than suspicion, with hatred that broke out in
bitter persecution. Who can read the history of Roger Bacon, the wondrous
monk; who can picture Copernicus on his death-bed as his immortal work is
brought to him ere yet his eyes are closed, he having shrunk from earlier
publication, lest the stake should be his portion; who can stand in the
Field of Flowers in Rome, and see there the statue erected where he was
burned to death, who dying in one century, lives for all centuries to
come--Giordano Bruno; who can listen to Galileo, as with faltering lips he
denies the truth he knows and utters the falsehood that he knows not; who
can follow these martyr-steps, led on by bitter memories of blood and
fire, without understanding the reason for the hostility of science to
religion, without confessing with shame and sorrow that that hostility was
caused and was justified by the cruelties wreaked by religion on science,
when science was young and feeble? Every one of us who stands upon the
side of religion should recognise that we are reaping the bitter harvest
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account